2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0032945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Older and wiser: Older adults’ episodic word memory benefits from sentence study contexts.

Abstract: A hallmark of adaptive cognition is the ability to modulate learning in response to the demands posed by different types of tests and different types of materials. Here we evaluate how older adults process words and sentences differently by examining patterns of memory errors. In two experiments, we explored younger and older adults’ sensitivity to lures on a recognition test following study of words in these two types of contexts. Among the studied words were compound words such as “blackmail” and “jailbird” … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a question for future research to understand the possible interplay of biases here. Overall, this finding fits with a broad body of research demonstrating the supportive nature of older adults' knowledge on their memory performance (e.g., Badham, Hay, Foxon, Kaur, & Maylor, 2015;Castel, 2005;Hess, 1990Hess, , 2005Hess et al, 1989;Hess & Tate, 1992;Laurence, 1967aLaurence, , 1967bMatzen & Benjamin, 2013;Sitzman et al, 2015), but adds to it with evidence that the stability of access to their knowledge may be critical in older adults' application of what they know.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is a question for future research to understand the possible interplay of biases here. Overall, this finding fits with a broad body of research demonstrating the supportive nature of older adults' knowledge on their memory performance (e.g., Badham, Hay, Foxon, Kaur, & Maylor, 2015;Castel, 2005;Hess, 1990Hess, , 2005Hess et al, 1989;Hess & Tate, 1992;Laurence, 1967aLaurence, , 1967bMatzen & Benjamin, 2013;Sitzman et al, 2015), but adds to it with evidence that the stability of access to their knowledge may be critical in older adults' application of what they know.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For instance, older adults continue to spell homophones (e.g., great/grate) in the most frequently used way (e.g., great), even after hearing a sentence that uses the infrequent form (e.g., grate), unlike younger adults (Howard, 1988). In fact, older adults' performance can improve significantly more (relative to any benefits that younger adults may experience) when knowledge is applicable, even extinguishing age differences in memory (e.g., Castel, 2005;Hess, Donley, & Vandermaas, 1989;Hess & Tate, 1992;Matzen & Benjamin, 2013). Thus, after encountering errors that contradict what they know, older adults may be more likely to use their stored knowledge, and thereby be protected from suggestibility, compared to their younger counterparts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Experiences consistent with pre-existing larger schemata in semantic memory have been found to consolidate faster into a long-lasting memory trace relative to inconsistent ones [50,51]. Along these lines, older adults have been found to encode new material more efficiently than younger adults but only when the information is encapsulated in a context that is natural for the respective material, for instance, when a target word was placed within a meaningful sentence [52,53]. These results imply that older adults' exposure to past environments can also have an indirect influence on the mental lexicon by impacting how new information is encoded.…”
Section: Prior Knowledgementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, memory and learning assessments usually feature a higher level of complexity and memory load and low applied (personal or work task) relevance. Such assessment often require participants to learn long word lists or paired associate words (Dunlosky et al, 2003) or involve data entry tasks Sharit, 1993, 1998) and recognition tests (Matzen and Benjamin, 2013). Many of these laboratory tests therefore call for participants to demonstrate maximal performance and extensive memorisation, rather than typical, "everyday" performance.…”
Section: The Cognitive Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%