Older Adults Perceptions of Technology and Barriers to Interacting with Tablet Computers: A Focus Group Study

Abstract

BackgroundNew technologies provide opportunities for the delivery of broad, flexible interventions with older adults. Focus groups were conducted to: (1) understand older adults’ familiarity with, and barriers to, interacting with new technologies and tablets; and (2) utilize user-engagement in refining an intervention protocol.MethodsEighteen older adults (65–76 years old; 83.3% female) who were novice tablet users participated in discussions about their perceptions of and barriers to interacting with tablets. We conducted three separate focus groups and used a generic qualitative design applying thematic analysis to analyse the data. The focus groups explored attitudes toward tablets and technology in general. We also explored the perceived advantages and disadvantages of using tablets, familiarity with, and barriers to interacting with tablets. In two of the focus groups, participants had previous computing experience (e.g., desktop), while in the other, participants had no previous computing experience. None of the participants had any previous experience with tablet computers.ResultsThe themes that emerged were related to barriers (i.e., lack of instructions and guidance, lack of knowledge and confidence, health-related barriers, cost); disadvantages and concerns (i.e., too much and too complex technology, feelings of inadequacy, and comparison with younger generations, lack of social interaction and communication, negative features of tablets); advantages (i.e., positive features of tablets, accessing information, willingness to adopt technology); and skepticism about using tablets and technology in general. After brief exposure to tablets, participants emphasized the likelihood of using a tablet in the future.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that most of our participants were eager to adopt new technology and willing to learn using a tablet. However, they voiced apprehension about lack of, or lack of clarity in, instructions and support. Understanding older adults’ perceptions of technology is important to assist with introducing it to this population and maximize the potential of technology to facilitate independent living.

Cardiac rehabilitation in older adults: New options

“…Despite this, by one small study of adults aged 65 to 76 years old who were relatively naïve to technology, especially tablets, the participants were eager to adopt the new technology, however, were apprehensive about lack of clarity in instructions and support. Understanding this perception and implementing eCR with this in mind may find increased support in this age group …”

“…Understanding this perception and implementing eCR with this in mind may find increased support in this age group. 44 6 | OTHER NOVEL METHODS OF CR group. 46 Art in its various forms has also been evaluated as a possible component of cardiovascular rehabilitation.…”

A Dietary Assessment App for Hospitalized Patients at Nutritional Risk: Development and Evaluation of the MyFood App (Preprint)

“…It is possible that use of an application for tablets is a larger barrier among older patients. However, qualitative studies among older persons have demonstrated that elderly persons often are positive to using tablets and eager to learn, even though cognitive deficits and low self-efficacy may limit the potential for use [47,48].…”

Towards “Tourism for All” – Improving Maps for Persons With Reduced Mobility

“…Many senior citizens strongly disapprove or cannot use smartphones (Müller et al, 2013) because of the technology barrier.They show skepticism about using technology in general due to age-related (e.g., cognitive decline) as well as technologyrelated (e.g., interface usability) barriers (Vaportzis et al, 2017) or simply the lack of resources (Kaganek et al, 2017) to purchase such devices. Therefore it is important to recognize the PRMs group diversity with regards their technological literacy and the introduction of a variety of map formats from non-interactive hard copy maps through to non-interactive soft copy maps (electronic versions) to those with GIS-type functionality -interactive geovisualisations.…”