2009
DOI: 10.1177/0165025409343754
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Older adults’ interactive behaviors during collaboration on everyday problems: Linking process and outcome

Abstract: Adult collaborative cognition research suggests that working with a partner is generally beneficial to performance; however, little research has investigated the relation between the interactive behaviors and collaborative outcome. The present study examined four interactive behaviors exhibited by familiar (i.e., married spouses) and unfamiliar (i.e., other-sex strangers) older adult dyads during collaborative performance on an everyday problem-solving measure. Results indicated that (a) interactive behaviors … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Failure to involve the partner in the automatic audiometry task may also have stemmed from a breakdown in action 2: the active solicitation of partner assistance by the participant. Despite extensive literature suggesting that for older adults, collaboration improves the achieved outcome across a variety of task domains (e.g., Dixon and Gould, 1998;Berg et al, 2007;Kimbler and Margrett, 2009), collaborative efforts to complete the automatic in situ audiometry task did not occur to the expected degree. A major contributor to this outcome may be the constraints imposed by the study protocol on how the participant and partner could interact.…”
Section: Partner Involvementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Failure to involve the partner in the automatic audiometry task may also have stemmed from a breakdown in action 2: the active solicitation of partner assistance by the participant. Despite extensive literature suggesting that for older adults, collaboration improves the achieved outcome across a variety of task domains (e.g., Dixon and Gould, 1998;Berg et al, 2007;Kimbler and Margrett, 2009), collaborative efforts to complete the automatic in situ audiometry task did not occur to the expected degree. A major contributor to this outcome may be the constraints imposed by the study protocol on how the participant and partner could interact.…”
Section: Partner Involvementmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As researchers have noted, in social settings, both social speech and externalized PS have task and regulatory functions (Centeno-Cortés and Jimenez 2004;De Guerrero 1994, 2004McCafferty 1994). Other studies have pointed out the relevance of social speech in adults while working in collaborative problem-solving tasks (Dixon et al 1997;Kimbler and Margrett 2009;Meegan and Berg 2002). In a collaborative situation, every statement, social and private, may have a regulatory role for the listener and the speaker, serving to focus the attention of the participants in the new information to solve the problem (Antón and DiCamilla 1998;DiCamilla and Antón 2004;Frawley and Lantolf 1985;Lantolf and Frawley 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected that partner involvement in the selffitting procedure would benefit our participants. Collaboration on problem-solving tasks has been shown to improve outcomes for older adults (Berg et al, 2007;Kimbler and Margrett, 2009) due to presumed compensatory effects on the cognitive declines associated with aging (Dixon, 1996;Dixon and Gould, 1996). Participants in all previous self-fitting studies were encouraged to attend with a partner, but constraints were placed on how they could interact (Convery et al, 2011;2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%