2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.05.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Old wood’ effect in radiocarbon dating of prehistoric cremated bones?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental evidence suggests that the carbon in calcined bone apatite may derive not only from the dated individual, but from the fuel used in the cremation process, and the atmosphere during the time of cremation (Snoeck et al 2014). This can lead to offsets in dates on calcined bone (Olsen et al 2013). We believe that this is not a significant issue at Barnhouse.…”
Section: A Stratigraphic Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Experimental evidence suggests that the carbon in calcined bone apatite may derive not only from the dated individual, but from the fuel used in the cremation process, and the atmosphere during the time of cremation (Snoeck et al 2014). This can lead to offsets in dates on calcined bone (Olsen et al 2013). We believe that this is not a significant issue at Barnhouse.…”
Section: A Stratigraphic Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The number of dates used to draw maps, the number of sites with dating in different regions and the average standard deviation (Ascough et al 2005), and although a correction factor can be applied, a considerable variation still exists (Soares and Dias 2006). We should also highlight some problems related to bone samples: more specifically, whether or not particular methods of ultrafiltration are used to control the quality of the collagen (Motuzaite-Matuzeviciute et al 2015;Wood 2015), as well as problems related to the use of bones affected by fire, similar to the old wood effect (Olsen et al 2013). Finally, dates of domestic samples are not without problems, in particular those associated with distinguishing some domestic species (animal or plant) from their wild counterparts: although the application of protein analysis (Martins et al 2015) seems to be a valid method for solving this problem in the near future.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, c. 1 g samples of undetermined bones found in the sieve Rangifer, 36, (1) 2016 were used for 14 C-dating. The use of bones for dating poses several problems that were raised by Lanting et al (2001) and have been heavily discussed since then (see, for example, Van Strydonck et al, 2009;Van Strydonck et al, 2010;Zazzo et al, 2009;Hüls et al, 2010;Olsen et al, 2013;Taylor & Yosef 2014;Philippsen 2015;Ekholm 2015). However, the soils in the boreal study area are mostly podzols, which are acidic and do not contain dissolved carbonates, thus minimizing one potential source of errors.…”
Section: Sampling Strategy and Field Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%