2018
DOI: 10.1101/448431
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Old fibroblasts secrete inflammatory cytokines that drive variability in reprogramming efficiency and may affect wound healing between old individuals

Abstract: Age-associated chronic inflammation (inflammaging) has emerged as a central hallmark of aging 1-3 , but its impact on specific cells is still largely unknown. Fibroblasts are present in all tissues and contribute to wound healing 4-6 . They are also the cell type that is mostly used for induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) reprogramming 7 -a process that has implications for regenerative medicine and rejuvenation strategies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . Here we show that primary fibroblasts from old… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 107 publications
(167 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefit/risk ratio of anti-aging strategies targeting inflammation (e.g., senolytics) or nutrient/metabolism-sensing pathways (e.g., DR/DRMs modulating the communication between metabolism and epigenetics) might be dictated by the pre-existing degree of epigenetic plasticity and phenotypic malleability of the different cell populations in aging tissues. Accordingly, the occurrence of intra- and inter-individual variability driven by sub-cellular/cellular (e.g., local availability of epigenetic substrates/cofactors and/or metabolic cues) and more systemic features (e.g., inflammation driven by senescent cells, activated fibroblasts or endothelial cells) begins to be understood as a consequence of different aging trajectories occurring in different tissue cell subpopulations [33]. This likely reflects changes in the short-range/paracrine communication between distinct cell types within a tissue, as well as between different individuals.…”
Section: Endogenous Heterogeneity and Individual-to-individual Variabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefit/risk ratio of anti-aging strategies targeting inflammation (e.g., senolytics) or nutrient/metabolism-sensing pathways (e.g., DR/DRMs modulating the communication between metabolism and epigenetics) might be dictated by the pre-existing degree of epigenetic plasticity and phenotypic malleability of the different cell populations in aging tissues. Accordingly, the occurrence of intra- and inter-individual variability driven by sub-cellular/cellular (e.g., local availability of epigenetic substrates/cofactors and/or metabolic cues) and more systemic features (e.g., inflammation driven by senescent cells, activated fibroblasts or endothelial cells) begins to be understood as a consequence of different aging trajectories occurring in different tissue cell subpopulations [33]. This likely reflects changes in the short-range/paracrine communication between distinct cell types within a tissue, as well as between different individuals.…”
Section: Endogenous Heterogeneity and Individual-to-individual Variabmentioning
confidence: 99%