2021
DOI: 10.1093/ajhp/zxab261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Old dog with new tricks: An introduction to real-world evidence for pharmacists

Abstract: Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RWE is derived from RWD and characterized by the routine use of health technologies in real life outside of the clinical trial setting [15]. RWD are collected from different sources [2,3,5,11,16] and can be quantitative or qualitative. They contain information pertaining to a patient's medical history, demographics, clinical outcomes, lab data, imaging information, resource use and costs, health behaviours and/or patient experiences [2,4,11].…”
Section: What Is Rwe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…RWE is derived from RWD and characterized by the routine use of health technologies in real life outside of the clinical trial setting [15]. RWD are collected from different sources [2,3,5,11,16] and can be quantitative or qualitative. They contain information pertaining to a patient's medical history, demographics, clinical outcomes, lab data, imaging information, resource use and costs, health behaviours and/or patient experiences [2,4,11].…”
Section: What Is Rwe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCTs are still the gold standard of evidence and are preferred to assess innovative technologies’ safety, efficacy, and effectiveness before launch. Apparently, despite low external validity because of the lack of generalizability, RCTs have a high level of internal validity due to the often-lower risk of bias [ 2 , 7 , 11 , 16 ]. However, sometimes randomization is unfeasible because of ethical issues and technical challenges (e.g., rare diseases and medical device technologies) [ 9 , 11 , 16 ].…”
Section: Why Does Rwe Matter?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations