2020
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32979
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olaparib for BRCA mutant pancreas cancer: Should the POLO trial change clinical practice?

Abstract: Because of the lack of a survival benefit, the suboptimal control arm design, and the overall health care costs, the authors do not believe that olaparib represents a major advance for patients with pancreatic cancer. The POLO trial illustrates that as a community, even in settings where there is a huge need, physicians must be rigorous in their methodology and mindful that they not lower the bar for new therapies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of these findings, the FDA has approved olaparib for maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic PDAC patients with germline mutations of BRCA1/2 who have not progressed on at least 16 wk of first-line PtCh. This approval is not without controversy as there are several criticisms of the POLO trial and unanswered questions in regards to this therapy[ 74 ]. For example, the lack of improvement in OS puts the validity of the finding of improved PFS into question[ 74 ].…”
Section: Management Of Brca-mutated Pdac: Systemic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In light of these findings, the FDA has approved olaparib for maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic PDAC patients with germline mutations of BRCA1/2 who have not progressed on at least 16 wk of first-line PtCh. This approval is not without controversy as there are several criticisms of the POLO trial and unanswered questions in regards to this therapy[ 74 ]. For example, the lack of improvement in OS puts the validity of the finding of improved PFS into question[ 74 ].…”
Section: Management Of Brca-mutated Pdac: Systemic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approval is not without controversy as there are several criticisms of the POLO trial and unanswered questions in regards to this therapy[ 74 ]. For example, the lack of improvement in OS puts the validity of the finding of improved PFS into question[ 74 ]. However, this may be because of the high rates of therapy in the placebo group following disease progression, including 15% of the patients who received a PARP inhibitor.…”
Section: Management Of Brca-mutated Pdac: Systemic Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…65 In addition to the lack of overall survival benefit, concerns have been raised with the design of the study including placebo instead of 5-FU monotherapy. 66 Moreover, olaparib associated health care costs with lack of overall survival benefit is further concerning.…”
Section: Role Of Parpi In Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mutation carriers deriving clinical benefit from a first line platinum-based CT, whether to maintain the initial regimen, to deescalate to a maintenance CT regimen without platinum, to stop all CT after 6 months or to switch to olaparib remain unanswered questions. It is a matter of debate whether, in the absence of an OS benefit and in the presence of some design flaws (absence of an active control arm), the POLO trial can change the standard of care ( 99 ). Certainly, it is a new option in a field where targeted and maintenance therapy are urgently required.…”
Section: Options In the Treatment Of Metastatic Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%