2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Okun's law, asymmetries and jobless recoveries in the United States: A Markov-switching approach

Abstract: This paper offers a new perspective on Markov regime-switching approaches to asymmetries in Okun's law by modeling the existing approaches as special cases.Prevailing models assume either asymmetry between unemployment and output across regimes or asymmetry within a single regime. Our specification combines both approaches. Our empirical results give an insight into the apparent 'jobless recovery' experiences that began in the United States in 1991 and 2001. KeywordsOkun's law Markov-switching asymmetry jobles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
1
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
40
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Much research has been conducted and almost all studies confirm this negative relationship (Knoester (1986), Paldam (1987), Kaufman (1988), Moosa (1997), Lee (2000), Freeman (2001), Silverstone and Harris (2001), Sögner and Stiassny (2002), Holmes and Silverstone (2006), Knotek (2007)). Therefore, Blinder (1997) calls it a core element of practical macroeconomic analysis we should all believe in.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much research has been conducted and almost all studies confirm this negative relationship (Knoester (1986), Paldam (1987), Kaufman (1988), Moosa (1997), Lee (2000), Freeman (2001), Silverstone and Harris (2001), Sögner and Stiassny (2002), Holmes and Silverstone (2006), Knotek (2007)). Therefore, Blinder (1997) calls it a core element of practical macroeconomic analysis we should all believe in.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Therefore, in the U.S. the notion of 'jobless recoveries' is more prominent than the notion of 'jobless growth', see Groshen and Potter (2003), Schreft and Singh (2003), Schreft et al (2005), Koenders and Rogerson (2005), Holmes and Silverstone (2006), and Jaimovich and Siu (2012). Recently, Ball et al (2013) have disputed the empirical evidence on 'jobless recoveries' in the U.S.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, he tried to explain the relation between economic growth and technological development. Okun (1962), in his study of the US economy, empirically proved the inverse relationship between the unemployment rate and the potential output, depending on the participation in the workforce, the duration of work and the change in productivity (Holmes and Silverstone, 2006).…”
Section: Economic Growth and Unemployment Issue: Panel Data Analysis mentioning
confidence: 99%