2018
DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.18.0790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Økt risiko for diabetes etter svangerskapsdiabetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The criteria since 2017 have been fasting plasma glucose level from 5.3 to 6.9 mmol/L and/or a plasma glucose level of 9.0-11.0 mmol/L after a 75 g OGTT during pregnancy. 18 A previous validation study of GDM registration in the MBRN reported a high positive predictive value (89% confirmed in medical records). 26…”
Section: Exposurementioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The criteria since 2017 have been fasting plasma glucose level from 5.3 to 6.9 mmol/L and/or a plasma glucose level of 9.0-11.0 mmol/L after a 75 g OGTT during pregnancy. 18 A previous validation study of GDM registration in the MBRN reported a high positive predictive value (89% confirmed in medical records). 26…”
Section: Exposurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…Norwegian maternal healthcare guidelines recommend a risk-based screening for GDM with an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) between 24 and 28 weeks of pregnancy. 18 The criteria for the diagnosis are diverse and have changed over time. 5 In Norway, the WHO 1999 criteria (fasting plasma glucose ≥7.0 or OGTT 75 g 2 hours glucose ≥7.8 mmol/L) were previously used to diagnose GDM, 5 but in 2017, a new national guideline was published.…”
Section: Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A necessary bit of context is the topographic and climatic conditions of Norwegian agriculture. The production conditions are generally harsh but vary widely: whereas the best agricultural areas are suitable both for grain and livestock production, the less advantageous areas are only suitable for livestock production (Arnoldussen et al, 2014). Thus, the canalisation policy essentially regulates a fundamental conflict of interest in the relationship between feed producers (grain farmers) and feed consumers (mainly dairy farmers).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%