1958
DOI: 10.1016/s0367-1615(17)32505-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ökologische Untersuchung der Bodenatmung

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1960
1960
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Haber (1958) showed, however, that with this method 75% ± 4.65o/o of the evolving C0 2 becomes absorbed. Lack of air turbulence, artificial convection layers through temperature changes within the tin, changes in C0 2 diffusion rates caused by absorption of C0 2 by KOH, and many other factors might influence results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Haber (1958) showed, however, that with this method 75% ± 4.65o/o of the evolving C0 2 becomes absorbed. Lack of air turbulence, artificial convection layers through temperature changes within the tin, changes in C0 2 diffusion rates caused by absorption of C0 2 by KOH, and many other factors might influence results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Soil respiration was measured by absorption of C0 2 by KOH followed by titration with HCI (Walter 1952, Haber 1958. The soil was cleared of all above ground plant parts and was covered with a 20-by 25-cm metal box.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maldague andHilger (1963, cited by Schlesinger 1977) reported a mean of 3.4 from four equatorial forests; Schulze (1967) reported some of the highest values in the literature (savanna in dry season 2.5 , gallery forest 10.4, wet forest 12.1, and young succession 19.5) from his work in Costa Rica; Yoda and Kira ( 1969) reported nine measurements from rain forests in Thailand, with a mean of 4.4; Odum et al (1970) evaluated several methodologies in Puerto Rico and reported values ranging from 1.6 to 10.2; Wanner (1970) measured rates of 0.8-1.5 in Java and 0.9-2.0 in Sarawak; Johnson et al (1975) reported ranges of 0.5-3.1 and 2.6-7.1 from two sites in Costa Rica; and Ogawa (1978) reported 3.9 from Malaysia. Some investigators (Schulze 1967, Medina 1969 follow the suggestion of Haber (1958) and multiply the measured amount of absorbed C0 2 by a correction factor of 1.33. However, we calculate that his weak solution (0.5N KOH), small absorbing volume (10 mL), and long absorption interval (10-12 h) would not have enabled him to detect accurately amounts of evolved C0 2 much larger than those he reported.…”
Section: Carbon Dioxide Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The carbon dioxide evolution from the soil surface was measured by the method of Haber (1958). Instead of metal, white plastic cylinders were used (diameter 22-5 cm, height 24 cm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%