2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oil shale CFBC ash cementation properties in ash fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Mõtlep et al [40], the content of glassy (X-ray amorphous) phases in PF ash fractions varies from about 27% in the furnace ash to a maximum of 38% in the cyclone ash, and decreases sequentially in the electrostatic precipitator system from 28% in the first field and 23% in the second field to only 1-2% in the last field of electrostatic precipitators. In the CFBC ash, however, the content of the amorphous phase is about 10-15%, showing no significant variation between ash fractions [38].…”
Section: Comparative Characterisation Of Os Ash Formed In Pf and Cfbcmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Mõtlep et al [40], the content of glassy (X-ray amorphous) phases in PF ash fractions varies from about 27% in the furnace ash to a maximum of 38% in the cyclone ash, and decreases sequentially in the electrostatic precipitator system from 28% in the first field and 23% in the second field to only 1-2% in the last field of electrostatic precipitators. In the CFBC ash, however, the content of the amorphous phase is about 10-15%, showing no significant variation between ash fractions [38].…”
Section: Comparative Characterisation Of Os Ash Formed In Pf and Cfbcmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The different combustion conditions present in PF and CFBC technologies cause remarkable differences in phase and chemical composition between ash fractions [37,38]. Specifically, the sharp difference in the operating temperature and fuel particle size [3] results in the different behaviour of Ca-containing compounds (Figs.…”
Section: Comparative Characterisation Of Os Ash Formed In Pf and Cfbcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[36]. More than 90% of oil shale ash is currently landfilled [38]. In landfills, it cements and binds approximately 8% of the total emitted carbon dioxide [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estonia has carried out many industrial-scale oil shale combustion experiments using different technologies. Compared to the more traditional pulverized firing (PF) furnace, the CFB furnace has several advantages such as satisfactory combustion efficiency, relatively low pollutant emissions and better adaptability [25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. CFB technology has been so far the most popular combustion method [22,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%