2018
DOI: 10.1504/ijgei.2018.10013429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oil price shocks and OECD equity markets: distinguishing between supply and demand effects

Abstract: With the recent changes in international financial markets, investors and policy-makers are paying special attention to the relationship between oil price shocks and equity markets. This paper investigates how oil supply and oil demand shocks interact with OECD countries and macroeconomic variables within a cointegration vector error correction framework, which provides extreme flexibility with a parsimonious specification. By defining oil supply and oil demand shocks as endogenous variables, our proposed mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, most previous studies on Sweden (including studies on organisation for economic co‐operation and development (OECD) countries, where Sweden is in the dataset) focused on estimating transport fuel price and income elasticities (e.g., Brännlund & Nordström, 2004; Karimu, 2014; Sterner, 1991; Sterner, Dahl, & Franzén, 1992), with no analysis on the impact of oil demand shocks or refinery shocks on the domestic motor fuel market. The other studies that included Sweden in their analysis of crude oil demand/or supply shocks on selected macroeconomic variables (e.g., Cashin et al, 2012; Dhaoui & Saidi, 2015), did not consider the domestic transport fuel market in the analysis. For instance, Dhaoui and Saidi (2015) focused on oil demand and supply shocks on stock prices, while Cashin et al (2012) considered both supply‐and‐demand‐driven oil price shocks on inflation, exchange rate and GDP, which no separate analysis was done for Sweden but rather aggregated into European major importing countries as a group.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, most previous studies on Sweden (including studies on organisation for economic co‐operation and development (OECD) countries, where Sweden is in the dataset) focused on estimating transport fuel price and income elasticities (e.g., Brännlund & Nordström, 2004; Karimu, 2014; Sterner, 1991; Sterner, Dahl, & Franzén, 1992), with no analysis on the impact of oil demand shocks or refinery shocks on the domestic motor fuel market. The other studies that included Sweden in their analysis of crude oil demand/or supply shocks on selected macroeconomic variables (e.g., Cashin et al, 2012; Dhaoui & Saidi, 2015), did not consider the domestic transport fuel market in the analysis. For instance, Dhaoui and Saidi (2015) focused on oil demand and supply shocks on stock prices, while Cashin et al (2012) considered both supply‐and‐demand‐driven oil price shocks on inflation, exchange rate and GDP, which no separate analysis was done for Sweden but rather aggregated into European major importing countries as a group.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other studies that included Sweden in their analysis of crude oil demand/or supply shocks on selected macroeconomic variables (e.g., Cashin et al, 2012; Dhaoui & Saidi, 2015), did not consider the domestic transport fuel market in the analysis. For instance, Dhaoui and Saidi (2015) focused on oil demand and supply shocks on stock prices, while Cashin et al (2012) considered both supply‐and‐demand‐driven oil price shocks on inflation, exchange rate and GDP, which no separate analysis was done for Sweden but rather aggregated into European major importing countries as a group. It is therefore important to provide information on the link between the oil and motor fuel market in Sweden, which is at least different from the exiting information, mostly focused on motor fuel price and income elasticities.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%