2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oil Palm Boom, Contract Farming, and Rural Economic Development: Village-Level Evidence from Indonesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
101
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Bowen and Gerritsen (2007) find that financial gains was the main motivation for agave producers in Mexico to participate in contract farming. Similar results (Cranfield, Blandon, & Henson, 2009) have been obtained for oil palm farmers in Indonesia (Gatto, Wollni, Asnawi, & Qaim, 2017), for vegetable producers in Honduras (Gatto et al, 2017), and for sugarcane farmers in Malawi (Herrmann & Grote, 2015).…”
Section: Smallholder Attitudes Towards Contract Farmingsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…For example, Bowen and Gerritsen (2007) find that financial gains was the main motivation for agave producers in Mexico to participate in contract farming. Similar results (Cranfield, Blandon, & Henson, 2009) have been obtained for oil palm farmers in Indonesia (Gatto, Wollni, Asnawi, & Qaim, 2017), for vegetable producers in Honduras (Gatto et al, 2017), and for sugarcane farmers in Malawi (Herrmann & Grote, 2015).…”
Section: Smallholder Attitudes Towards Contract Farmingsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Example of socio‐economic dimensions include land exploitation impact on native communities' rights and land rights or on pesticide use impact on the labourers' health (Rist, Feintrenie, & Levang, ). Socio‐economic issues also include the rights of palm oil labourers in developing countries and the support to smallholder farmers in order to guarantee an adequate remuneration and survival (Basiron & Weng, ; Gatto et al, ; Gatto, Wollni, Asnawi, & Qaim, ; Teoh, ). Moving to the manufacturing stage of the agri‐food chain, the ongoing debate points out that palm oil ingredient reduces production costs contributing to increase food accessibility for lower income people (Lam et al, ; Von Geibler, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Example of socio-economic dimensions include land exploitation impact on native communities' rights and land rights or on pesticide use impact on the labourers' health (Rist, Feintrenie, & Levang, 2010). Socio-economic issues also include the rights of palm oil labourers in developing countries and the support to smallholder farmers in order to guarantee an adequate remuneration and survival (Basiron & Weng, 2004;Gatto et al, 2015;Gatto, Wollni, Asnawi, & Qaim, 2017;Teoh, 2010).…”
Section: Socio-economic Sustainability Dimensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although oil palm is of economic value to farmers and the local regions in which it is grown, it has received environmental and social criticism, often being held responsible for deforestation (Wicke et al, 2011;Vijay et al, 2016;Gatto et al, 2017), biodiversity loss (Fitzherbert et al, 2008;Koh and Wilcove, 2008;Wilcove and Koh, 2010;Carlson et al, 2012;Krashevska et al, 2015), decreased soil carbon stocks (Guillaume et al, 2015Pransiska et al, 2016), and increased greenhouse gas emissions (Allen et al, 2015;Hassler et al, 2017). Similarly, rubber plantations have environmental impacts such as reducing the soil infiltration capacity, accelerating soil erosion, increasing stream sediment loads (Ziegler et al, 2009;Tarigan et al, 2016b), and decreasing soil carbon stocks (Ziegler et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%