2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1365100515000760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oil Dependence, International Borrowings, and Economic Instability in a Small Open Economy

Abstract: The existing literature dealing with mutual interactions between the extent of oil dependence and the possibility of belief-driven fluctuations unanimously ignores international loans. This simplified assumption disregards the fact that the relative magnitude of the financial account and the trade account exhibits an increasing trend. Faced with this deficiency in the literature, this paper develops a real business cycle model featuring oil dependence in domestic production and international loans, and examine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9. Notice that quarterly data are used in Kydland and Prescott (1991), Aguiar-Conraria and Wen (2008), and Lai et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9. Notice that quarterly data are used in Kydland and Prescott (1991), Aguiar-Conraria and Wen (2008), and Lai et al (2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Karnizova (2010) and Finkelstein Shapiro and Mandelman (2016), the capital share is set to α = 0.32. The rate of time preference is set to ρ = 0.04, as used by Kydland and Prescott (1991), Aguiar-Conraria and Wen 2008, and Lai et al (2017). 9 The annual depreciation rate is set to δ = 0.1, as used by Aguiar-Conraria and Wen 2008, Karnizova (2010), and Finkelstein Shapiro and Mandelman (2016).…”
Section: Transitional Dynamics Of Optimal Factor Tax Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benchmark value of the degree of firm heterogeneity κ is set to 4.25, which is taken from Melitz and Redding (2015). In line with Aguiar‐Conraria and Wen (2012) and Lai et al (2017), the inverse labor supply elasticity ε is set to 0. Based on Cadot et al (2006) and Roulleau‐Pasdeloup (2013), the extent of productive government spending is set to χ=0.08.…”
Section: Equilibrium and The Optimal Fiscal Policymentioning
confidence: 99%