2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09226-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Oh-oh, the others are standing up... I better do the same”. Mixed-method evaluation of the implementation process of ‘Take a Stand!’ - a cluster randomized controlled trial of a multicomponent intervention to reduce sitting time among office workers

Abstract: Background: Multicomponent workplace-based interventions aimed at reducing sitting time among office workers are becoming increasingly popular. 'Take a Stand!' was such an intervention, reducing sitting time by 71 min after 1 month and 48 min after 3 months. However, it is unclear how the implementation process of 'Take a Stand!' affected these results. The present study explored how individual factors and organizational context influenced implementation and effect in 'Take a Stand!' Methods: This was a mixed-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Office layouts featuring activity-based working, without fixed workstations and allowing employees to choose adjustable work settings appropriate for each task, can decrease sedentary behavior and increase physical activity [14]. Multicomponent interventions comprising environmental changes, workshops, and collective goal setting, with management support can increase solidarity and participants’ motivation to reduce sitting time [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Office layouts featuring activity-based working, without fixed workstations and allowing employees to choose adjustable work settings appropriate for each task, can decrease sedentary behavior and increase physical activity [14]. Multicomponent interventions comprising environmental changes, workshops, and collective goal setting, with management support can increase solidarity and participants’ motivation to reduce sitting time [15].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To be effective, norms should be specific to the situation [52][53][54], hence norms on dieting can be supported more easily via observation of others in the workplace, a setting which often includes eating meals [19]. Moreover, extremely athletic colleagues could demotivate others by giving them the impression that this level of physical activity is out of reach for them [15,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, seeing many colleagues bike rather than drive their two-mile to work may lead employees to ponder whether this is also something they could try. For self-efficacy, the comparison with similar others is key: frenetic colleagues (e.g., biking 10 miles per journey) may seem out of range and trigger feelings of demotivation [ 15 , 30 ].…”
Section: Explanatory Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The successful implementation of a health-promoting intervention may require legitimacy from man-agement, participators, and colleagues. A positive atmosphere and a joint effort among colleagues may reduce sedentary behavior at work [28].…”
Section: Work Culturementioning
confidence: 99%