2015
DOI: 10.1111/nana.12123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Oh motherland I pledge to thee …’: a study into nationalism, gender and the representation of an imagined family within national anthems

Abstract: In this paper, we argue that beyond understanding nations as imagined communities, the metaphor of an ‘imagined family’ or ‘filial community’ is a more useful concept towards understanding links between gender and nationhood as family relations in four ways: (1) providing a clear, hierarchical structure; (2) prescribing social roles and responsibilities; (3) being linked to positive affective connotations; and (4) reifying social phenomena as biologically determined. In order to empirically substantiate our cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to any demographic explanations for the differences in mean fusion scores between the US and Indian subsamples, the potential effect of the dominant discourses about nationhood in both societies should also be considered. For example, the prevalence of discourses about national “brotherhood” and metaphors of the nation as an “imagined family” (Lauenstein, Murer, Boos, & Reicher, 2015) differs between cultures; hence, the language of identity fusion could be perceived as more or less natural depending on the prevalence of this type of discourse in a given society. In effect, people in some cultures may be more inclined to speak of “dying” for their “brothers” because such language represents the normal way of expressing patriotism in their culture and not necessarily because it reflects a deeper psychological commitment to the nation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to any demographic explanations for the differences in mean fusion scores between the US and Indian subsamples, the potential effect of the dominant discourses about nationhood in both societies should also be considered. For example, the prevalence of discourses about national “brotherhood” and metaphors of the nation as an “imagined family” (Lauenstein, Murer, Boos, & Reicher, 2015) differs between cultures; hence, the language of identity fusion could be perceived as more or less natural depending on the prevalence of this type of discourse in a given society. In effect, people in some cultures may be more inclined to speak of “dying” for their “brothers” because such language represents the normal way of expressing patriotism in their culture and not necessarily because it reflects a deeper psychological commitment to the nation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of an article that focuses on the role of the motherland image in national anthems express a remarkable opinion that the metaphor of an "imagined family" is a more useful concept toward understanding the nation than that of an "imagined community." The former helps to highlight links between gender and nationhood as family relations in four ways: (1) providing a clear, hierarchical structure; (2) prescribing social roles and responsibilities; (3) being linked to positive affective connotations; and (4) reifying social phenomena as biologically determined (Lauenstein, Murer, Boos, and Reicher 2015).…”
Section: Mothering a Nation And The Legitimation Of Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…National anthems have been a topic for sociological and cultural analyses, including interpretations / commentaries on their nationalism, family, sexism, suicide rates and others -with cross-cultural implications in several cases (Abril, 2012;Barnes, Pomerantz, & Yashko, 2016;Boufoy-Bastick, 2012;Gilboa & Bodner, 2009;Guerrini & Kennedy, 2009;Kelen, 2014Kelen, , 2015Kyridis et al, 2009;Lauenstein, Murer, Boos, & Reicher, 2015;Lester & Gunn, 2011;Liao, Zhang, & Zhang, 2012;Oluga, Seng, & Rajoo, 2016;Rodríguez, 2016;Siska, 2016;Sondermann, 2013;Vörös et al, 2016;Winstone & Witherspoon, 2016). Most such studies were, however, focused on a distinct theme and/or on a culturallylimited number of anthems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%