2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.09.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ogre-Faced, Net-Casting Spiders Use Auditory Cues to Detect Airborne Prey

Abstract: Highlights d D. spinosa are acoustically sensitive to a wide range of airborne tonal frequencies d Spiders respond to low-frequency tones as if capturing a flying insect d Spiders do not behaviorally respond to high-frequency tones in a foraging context d The metatarsal organ seems to play a role in acoustic detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 D and E ) suggest that mechanical strain is actively induced on the spider’s legs when stimulated by airborne sound. In spiders, vibrational signals, such as faint acoustic stimuli, are presumably detected by the strain-sensitive lyriform organs located in spider legs ( 19 21 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 D and E ) suggest that mechanical strain is actively induced on the spider’s legs when stimulated by airborne sound. In spiders, vibrational signals, such as faint acoustic stimuli, are presumably detected by the strain-sensitive lyriform organs located in spider legs ( 19 21 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous dogma has understood that the reception, and thus importance, of air particle movement in communication would be limited because it only occurs at short distances from the source-approximately 0.5-1 wavelength (Kinsler, 1999;Jacobsen, 2007;Raboin and Elias, 2019). Recent studies, however (e.g., Shamble et al, 2016;Menda et al, 2019;Stafstrom et al, 2020) suggest that the detection of air particle movement may take place at much longer distances than previously thought (reviewed in Raboin and Elias, 2019), making it a viable mode of communication. Nonetheless, air particle movement (also referred to as near-field sound) has been overlooked and underappreciated as a signaling modality, and the impact of noise on this understudied signaling modality is even more unknown (Raboin and Elias, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a silken net spun of a fuzzy, mechanical-capture silk (cribellate silk) rather than gluey silk, deinopids remain motionless until a prospective prey comes into view. They lunge into a forward strike, extending their webs with their legs and then envelope their prey, rendering them immobile 1 , 4 7 . They are also capable of a backward strike detecting vibrations of flying prey, hence are not entirely reliant on their enlarged eyes for prey capture 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They lunge into a forward strike, extending their webs with their legs and then envelope their prey, rendering them immobile 1 , 4 7 . They are also capable of a backward strike detecting vibrations of flying prey, hence are not entirely reliant on their enlarged eyes for prey capture 7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%