2018
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabcd2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OGLE-2017-BLG-1130: The First Binary Gravitational Microlens Detected from Spitzer Only

Abstract: We analyze the binary gravitational microlensing event OGLE-2017-BLG-1130 (mass ratio q∼0.45), the first published case in which the binary anomaly was detected only by the Spitzer Space Telescope. This event provides strong evidence that some binary signals can be missed by observations from the ground alone but detected by Spitzer. We therefore invert the normal procedure, first finding the lens parameters by fitting the space-based data and then measuring the microlensing parallax using ground-based obser… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is possible in principle since the ground-based and space-based observatories probe different parts of the Einstein ring (Gould & Horne 2013). For example, the binary anomaly of OGLE-2018-BLG-1130 was only detected by Spitzer while showing no binarity in the ground-based observations (Wang et al 2018).…”
Section: Ogle-2015-blg-0448mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter is possible in principle since the ground-based and space-based observatories probe different parts of the Einstein ring (Gould & Horne 2013). For example, the binary anomaly of OGLE-2018-BLG-1130 was only detected by Spitzer while showing no binarity in the ground-based observations (Wang et al 2018).…”
Section: Ogle-2015-blg-0448mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PID 10036, 11006, 12013, 12015, 13005, 14012, PI: S. Dong; PID: 13250, PI: S. Carey; PID 14121). Following the successful 2014 pilot program, Spitzer took on a new role as a 'microlens parallax satellite' with the primary objective of measuring the Galactic distribution of exoplanets towards the bulge (Calchi Novati et al 2015a,b, 2018Shvartzvald et al 2015Shvartzvald et al , 2016Shvartzvald et al , 2017Shvartzvald et al , 2019Udalski et al 2015bUdalski et al , 2018Yee et al 2015a,b;Zhu et al 2015aZhu et al ,b, 2016Zhu et al , 2017bBozza et al 2016;Han et al 2016Han et al , 2017Han et al , 2018Poleski et al 2016;Street et al 2016;Chung et al 2017Chung et al , 2019Shin et al 2017Shin et al , 2018Albrow et al 2018;Ryu et al 2018;Wang et al 2018;Jung et al 2019;Li et al 2019;Shan et al 2019;Zang et al 2019Zang et al , 2020Gould et al 2020;Hirao et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For microlensing events, it is possible that the source passed close to a component of the lens system as seen by K2, but the trajectory seen from the ground did not pass this component closely (Gould & Horne 2013;Poleski et al 2016;Wang et al 2018). Identifying such events may be problematic in photometric methods that depend on an assumed astrophysical model.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last argument is the Bayesian inference. Because the lens distance and velocity are calculated in each solution, we can statistically estimate the lens location for each solution by conducting a Bayesian analysis with a typical Galactic model (Zhu et al 2017;Wang et al 2018). In practice, we estimate the probabilities that the lens lies in the bulge or the disc separately in each solution.…”
Section: Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%