„Oficialioji lietuvių kalba yra negyva kalba.“ Žurnalistai apie bendrinę kalbą televizijoje ir radijuje

Vaicekauskienė, Loreta

doi:10.7220/2335-8769.55.14

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Sukaupta medžiaga naudotasi kituose kalbininkų tyrimuose (žr., pavyzdžiui, Kruopienė, Kačiuškienė 2008). Tačiau sulaukta kritikos dėl apibendrinamųjų straipsnių tono, žurnalistų pavardžių minėjimo, vertinant akciją daryta plačių kalbos politikos apibendrinimų (Vaicekauskienė 2011;Vaicekauskienė 2016, 258-259;Nevinskaitė, Tamaševičius 2019 ir kt.). Kalbos švaros dienos suteikė pamokų ir LKD: paskatino vidines diskusijas apie bendravimo su visuomene būdus (Klimavičius 2007;Kazlauskaitė 2008, 24-25) ir naujų veiklos formų paieškas.…”

Section: Kalbos Praktikai Skirtų Renginių Pristatymasunclassified

Lietuvių kalbos draugijos ir kitų visuomeninių kalbos organizacijų veiklos sklaida „Gimtosios kalbos“ žurnale

Urnėžiūtė

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After the restoration of Lithuania’s independence in 1990, non-governmental organizations devoted to the linguistic education, the teaching of the Lithuanian language and its popularisation, and the rights of the state language, that had been active during the interwar period, began to be re-established. The most prominent of the organizations restored were the Lithuanian Language Society and the Union of Teachers of Lithuanian Language and Literature. During the years of the restored independence, various new organizations emerged whose aims and activities had more or less in common with those of the Lithuanian Language Society and the Union of Teachers of the Lithuanian Language and Literature. In 1990, the language popularisation periodical “Gimtoji kalba” [Mother Tongue], which had been established in Kaunas in 1933, was restored. The object of the analysis is the information about the activities of non-governmental language organizations published in the restored periodical. The main focus is on the Lithuanian Language Society, a non-governmental organization that was the editor (1935–1937 in Lithuania, 1958–1968 in the USA) and the publisher (1938–1941 and 1990–1996 in Lithuania) of the “Gimtoji kalba”. The aim of the paper is to highlight and summarise the changes in the goals of the Lithuanian Language Society, the development of its activities, and the search for new forms of activities, as reflected in the publications of “Gimtoji kalba”. Descriptive, analytical and summarizing methods were applied. The analysis of the publications in “Gimtoji kalba” shows that the restored Lithuanian Language Society, which at first based its activity on the experience of the interwar period and the language movement of 1968–1988, contributed to the development of the state language surveillance system. The development of the state language surveillance system has led to a change in the direction of the Society’s activities. While at the beginning of the restoration of independence the focus was on language correctness and its maintenance, over time the Lithuanian Language Society became increasingly oriented towards linguistic education of society and promotion of the Lithuanian language.

show abstract

Section: Kalbos Praktikai Skirtų Renginių Pristatymasunclassified

Lietuvių kalbos draugijos ir kitų visuomeninių kalbos organizacijų veiklos sklaida „Gimtosios kalbos“ žurnale

Urnėžiūtė

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…2004 m. J. Girčienė sudarė straipsnių rinktinę "Skoliniai ir bendrinė kalba" (Girčienė 2004a). Straipsniuose kalbama apie skolinių norminimo teoriją ir praktiką, aptariami teoriniai svetimžodžių norminimo pagrindai (Vaicekauskienė 2004), svarstomi šio leksikos sluoksnio pateikimo ir vertinimo norminamuosiuose leidiniuose kriterijai (Mikulėnienė 2004), skolinių vertės motyvacija (Miliūnaitė 2004). Nemažai dėmesio skiriama naujiesiems skoliniams: nagrinėjami vadinamieji seni naujieji skoliniai (Klimavičius 2004), aptariami naujųjų skolinių ir jų atitikmenų konkurencijos polinkiai (Girčienė 2004b;Urnėžiūtė 2004).…”

Section: Leksikos Tyrimai (Xxi a Pradžia)unclassified

Leksikos vartosenos tyrimai ir leksikografinė praktika

Zubaitienė

2024

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article presents research on the usage of Lithuanian lexis and lexicographical works on the Lithuanian language from the beginning of the 20th century to the present day. It reveals how scientific research has been related to academic activity and lexicographic work (data gathering, analysis, dictionary development), and vice versa. Talking about the early and mid-20th century, the focus lies on the well-grounded articles on appropriate language use by Kazimieras Būga and on the preparation of the “Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language”, as well as on Jonas Jablonskis’ interest in the standard language, creation of new words, his work on the dictionary of Antanas Juška and his reviews of earlier dictionaries. Jablonskis’ own “Mūsų žodynėlis” [Our Dictionary] is also briefly discussed. Further on, the article talks about the work of Juozas Balčikonis and the beginnings of the academic “Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language”. Particular mention is made of Pranas Skardžius’ and Antanas Salys’ research on word structure and usage. In addition, various articles in language journals as well as the structure and editorial principles of the journal “Kalbos patarėjas” are reviewed. The research in the Soviet era is mainly associated with the lexicographical activities of Jonas Kruopas and Kazys Ulvydas and the editorial work on both the (historical) “Dictionary of the Lithuanian Language” and the “Dictionary of the Present Lithuanian Language”. The research interest of this period lies primarily in the analysis of lexical structure and systemic relations, whereas publication activity focuses on editing special dictionaries (such as dictionaries of synonyms, antonyms, valency, phraseology, and comparisons), and the publication of textbooks and monographs in the field of lexicology. The article gives an overview of studies that analyse the development and change of various lexical items, describe different semantic groups, language variation, and its phrasal components. Furthermore, lexical databases and the information system e.kalba are given an overview. The main focus here lies on reviewing lexical research and lexicographical projects carried out in the 1990s and the early 21st century, and on revealing lexicographical problems.

show abstract

“…Tyrimas atskleidė, kad dauguma žurnalistų neįžvelgia grėsmių lietuvių kalbai, tačiau pritaria, kad kalbą reikia prižiūrėti. Žurnalistų požiūrį į lietuvių kalbos standartizavimą ir bendrinę kalbą televizijoje ir radijuje nagrinėjo Loreta Vaicekauskienė (2011). Tyrimo medžiaga parodė, kad, kaip ir L. Nevinskaitės (2009) tyrime, dauguma žurnalistų yra linkę viešojoje erdvėje palaikyti standartinį kalbos variantą.…”

Section: įVadasunclassified

Language Editors: Job Prestige, Influence on Language and Perceived Threats

Jakaitė-Bulbukienė

Micutaitė

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The object of this work is to analyse Lithuanian language editors‘ self-assessment of their own work, to see how they are influenced by societal attitudes, and to uncover their relationship to Lithuanian language. These aspects help to investigate the linguistic attitudes of Lithuanian language editors. This is analysis of 10 qualitative in-depth semi-structured interviews with Lithuanian language editors. The texts edited by the participants vary in their nature. All informants are women. Nine interviews have been conducted orally and one in writing. The method applied is qualitative content analysis of the interviews. It has been found that the informants of the study feel that there are critical, skeptical attitudes towards language editors and linguists in general in the public sphere. Editors also often hear inaccurate assessments of their profession from inner cycle. However, most of them do not take such attitudes seriously and do their work without taking them into account. It has been found that most of the informants feel that they contribute to the development of the Lithuanian language and that they influence the language. This is because even editors with extensive editing experience are constantly confronted with new phenomena. Most of the informants of this study have told they can edit freely, are trusted by clients or writers, and are not constrained making their decisions. Editors have also answered that they have a mission to enrich and purify language. A small number of informants of the study have told that they do not see themselves as language creators, but only as executors of the already established language policy. Some editors have indicated they want to stop the influence of English to Lithuanian, while others believe that the influence of other languages is a natural phenomenon, and stress that the language is impoverished by an excessive desire to purify it.

show abstract

„Oficialioji lietuvių kalba yra negyva kalba.“ Žurnalistai apie bendrinę kalbą televizijoje ir radijuje

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Lietuvių kalbos draugijos ir kitų visuomeninių kalbos organizacijų veiklos sklaida „Gimtosios kalbos“ žurnale

Lietuvių kalbos draugijos ir kitų visuomeninių kalbos organizacijų veiklos sklaida „Gimtosios kalbos“ žurnale

Leksikos vartosenos tyrimai ir leksikografinė praktika

Language Editors: Job Prestige, Influence on Language and Perceived Threats

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About