1971
DOI: 10.1071/aj70015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offshore Gippsland Basin Fields

Abstract: The offshore Gippsland Basin, underlies the continental shelf and slope between eastern Victoria and Tasmania.The basin is filled with up to 25,000' of sediment, varying in age from Lower Cretaceous to Recent. The Lower Cretaceous section is represented by at least 10,000' of nonmarine greywackes of the Strzelecki Group. The overlying sediments of Upper Cretaceous to Eocene age comprise the interbedded sandstones, siltstones, shales and coals of the Latrobe Group, with a cumulative thickness of about 15,000'. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would occur at less than 122 m sediment thickness. James & Evans (1971) and Griffith & Hodgson (1971) report a maximum Pliocene to Holocene sequence of 304 m in the Gippsland Basin. The maximum sediment thickness above SI at the continental edge in the present study area ranges from 120 to 212 m. These figures place the SI surface in the same depth range as the middle to lower Pliocene unconformity in Gippsland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This would occur at less than 122 m sediment thickness. James & Evans (1971) and Griffith & Hodgson (1971) report a maximum Pliocene to Holocene sequence of 304 m in the Gippsland Basin. The maximum sediment thickness above SI at the continental edge in the present study area ranges from 120 to 212 m. These figures place the SI surface in the same depth range as the middle to lower Pliocene unconformity in Gippsland.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unfortunately, the timing of the tectonic events appears to be much less accurately known than the age of the regional unconformity and this introduces an element of speculation into Elliotfs case. Furthermore, his idea that the easternmost margin of Australia underwent uplift during the Eocene appears to be contrary to information now available which indicates that much of the present offshore easternmost Australia was subjected to marine transgression during the Paleogene (Oppel, 1970;Griffith and Hodgson, 1971;James and Evans, 1971;Palmieri, 1971;Burns, Andrews, et al, 1973;Heckel, 1973;Stover and Evans, 1973;and Kennett, Houtz, et al, 1975).…”
Section: Possible Southwest Pacific Correlativesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…James and Evans (1971), Griffith and Hodgson (1971), and Stover and Evans (1973) outline the occurrence of a widespread subsurface mid Cenozoic unconformity in the offshore Gippsland Basin of southeast Australia. The unconformity usually separates a thick downwarped and somewhat eroded sequence of Late Cretaceous to (early?)…”
Section: Possible Southwest Pacific Correlativesmentioning
confidence: 99%