2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Offshore field experiments with in-situ burning of oil: Emissions and burn efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E.g., for ISB residues sampled at three different locations in the boom after ISB of IFO180 [ 37 ], the BE was estimated to vary from approximately 30–60% (sample with highest BE was used in this study). Estimated BE for ULSFO was 57 % and more than 95 % for MGO [ 16 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…E.g., for ISB residues sampled at three different locations in the boom after ISB of IFO180 [ 37 ], the BE was estimated to vary from approximately 30–60% (sample with highest BE was used in this study). Estimated BE for ULSFO was 57 % and more than 95 % for MGO [ 16 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offshore in situ burning experiments took place at the former Frigg field in the Norwegian part of the North Sea in mid-June [ 16 ]. About 6 m 3 of each oil were released and contained into a fire-boom before being ignited by use of a "Pyro-drone" (DESMI) with a gelled ignitor consisting of diesel (80 %) and gasoline (20 %).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations