2010
DOI: 10.1080/13854046.2010.526785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Official position of the american academy of clinical neuropsychology on serial neuropsychological assessments: the utility and challenges of repeat test administrations in clinical and forensic contexts

Abstract: Serial assessments are now common in neuropsychological practice, and have a recognized value in numerous clinical and forensic settings. These assessments can aid in differential diagnosis, tracking neuropsychological strengths and weaknesses over time, and managing various neurologic and psychiatric conditions. This document provides a discussion of the benefits and challenges of serial neuropsychological testing in the context of clinical and forensic assessments. Recommendations regarding the use of repeat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
114
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In clinical and research contexts, longitudinal assessments are crucial to verify disease progression, help the differential diagnosis and measure possible treatment effects. Nevertheless, serial assessment also presents with several challenges, especially regarding practice effects [32]. Although not eliminating all of the carryover effects of the test-retest method -e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In clinical and research contexts, longitudinal assessments are crucial to verify disease progression, help the differential diagnosis and measure possible treatment effects. Nevertheless, serial assessment also presents with several challenges, especially regarding practice effects [32]. Although not eliminating all of the carryover effects of the test-retest method -e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not eliminating all of the carryover effects of the test-retest method -e.g. performance can still improve because the subject learns how to effectively approach a task -the alternate-form method reduces important confounders related to repeated exposure to a specific task [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Novelty effects (during the initial evaluation a test is novel to the subject, on repeat testing, the test becomes familiar) can increase or decrease performance (Suchy et al 2010). Test-retest reliability can also be influenced by the retest interval (Heilbronner et al 2010) and by floor and ceiling effects (Duff 2012). The applied neuropsychological tests are reported to have a comparatively high test-retest reliability (Basso et al 1999) and our subjects were familiarized with the test procedures to reduce test-retest bias.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite encouraging evidence on the ability of the MoCA to detect change, an assessment of population-specific suitability is advised, as recently shown in a work on Parkinson's disease (PD) where the MoCA was not more sensitive than the MMSE in measuring cognitive deterioration [5]. Another concern deals with the various challenges longitudinal assessments denote [6]. As a way to overcome some of the obstacles related to serial assessment, in particular those related to practice effects, we recently validated two alternate forms of the German MoCA [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%