2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Office versus leisure environments: Effects of surroundings on concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants may have switched the focus from the flood of news to valuable activities such as reading a book, drawing, painting or playing music among other things that lead to a better adaptation in this prolonged condition. As reported in other studies, people could strengthen relationships, find means to express creativity or get a better sense of personal growth during adverse situations (Burmeister et al, 2018;Forgays & Forgays, 1992;Mocellin et al, 1991;Rosnet et al, 1998;Wanberg & Banas, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Participants may have switched the focus from the flood of news to valuable activities such as reading a book, drawing, painting or playing music among other things that lead to a better adaptation in this prolonged condition. As reported in other studies, people could strengthen relationships, find means to express creativity or get a better sense of personal growth during adverse situations (Burmeister et al, 2018;Forgays & Forgays, 1992;Mocellin et al, 1991;Rosnet et al, 1998;Wanberg & Banas, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These specific personnel have to adapt to and survive sudden challenging circumstances (Nicolas et al, 2019). In this regard, studies have shown the environmental influence when displaying either positive (Burmeister et al, 2018;Forgays & Forgays, 1992;Mocellin et al, 1991;Rosnet et al,1998;Wanberg & Banas, 2000) or negative behavioral responses (James & Glaze, 2006;Knez et al, 2018;Nicolas et al, 2015;Palinkas, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The items are listed in Table 1 . Specifically, the questionnaire was organized as follows: (1) pandemic influence was assessed utilizing seven items from the scales of Wenham et al [ 47 ] and Wong et al [ 48 ]; (2) leisure environment was assessed utilizing five items from the scales of Burmeister et al [ 49 ] and Pereira et al [ 50 ]; (3) leisure satisfaction was assessed utilizing five items from the scales of Wang [ 51 ] and Dai et al [ 52 ]; (4) community identity was assessed utilizing seven items from the scales of Thongpanya [ 53 ] and Bacon and Kaya [ 54 ]; (5) SWB was assessed utilizing seven items from the scales of Etxeberria [ 55 ] and Sumargo and Novalia [ 56 ]; and (6) further items were included to collect the demographic information of the participants, including age, gender, education level, and type of residence.…”
Section: Samples and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i.e., score equal to 6.5) percentiles, we categorized the studies into "high quality", "medium quality" and "low quality" (Table S3). Fourteen studies were classified as having a high quality (Annerstedt et al, 2013;Blum et al, 2019;Browning, Mimnaugh et al, 2020;Hedblom et al, 2019;Huang et al, 2020;Lakhani et al, 2020;O'meara et al, 2020;Palanica et al, 2019;Rockstroh et al, 2019;Schutte et al, 2017;Sneed et al, 2021;Tabrizian et al, 2018;Wang et al, 2020;Yeo et al, 2020),a further sixteen studies (Anderson et al, 2017;Calogiuri et al, 2018;Chirico, & Gaggioli, 2019;Fleury et al, 2021;Hofman et al, 2021;Lindquist et al, 2020;Liszio, & Masuch, 2019;Liszio et al, 2018;Mattila et al, 2020;Reese et al, 2021;Schebella et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2019;Xiang et al, 2021;Yu et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2020) were classified as having "medium quality", and eight (Burmeister et al, 2018;Evensen et al, 2021;Gao et al, 2019a;2019b;Je, & Lee, 2020;Mostajeran et al, 2021;Pals et al, 2014;van Vliet et al, 2021) as having "low quality". The item in which we found a lower overall score is that on power analysis (pre-or post-hoc) which...…”
Section: Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%