2022
DOI: 10.1177/01945998221074528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Office Insertion of Tympanostomy Tubes and the Role of Automated Insertion Devices

Abstract: Objective Insertion of tubes in an office setting and automated tube insertion devices were identified as high-priority quality improvement opportunities during the update process for the 2013 clinical practice guideline on tympanostomy tubes from the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery. The guideline update group, however, decided to avoid any recommendations on these topics, based on limited research evidence, and instead selected a subset of group members to author this state of the art… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results corroborate that in‐office procedures performed with the Tula System have similar long‐term outcomes to traditional TT placement and address prior limitations in the scientific evidence for automated tube delivery systems 5 . In addition, there are potential benefits in both patient experience and economic savings associated with the in‐office procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results corroborate that in‐office procedures performed with the Tula System have similar long‐term outcomes to traditional TT placement and address prior limitations in the scientific evidence for automated tube delivery systems 5 . In addition, there are potential benefits in both patient experience and economic savings associated with the in‐office procedure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…24 These results corroborate that in-office procedures performed with the Tula System have similar long-term outcomes to traditional TT placement and address prior limitations in the scientific evidence for automated tube delivery systems. 5 In addition, there are potential benefits in both patient experience and economic savings associated with the in-office procedure. While traditional tympanostomy under GA can require 2 to 3 hours for procedure and patient recovery time, 8 the average Tula procedure time is 33 minutes, and 76% of patients returned to normal activity immediately at the conclusion of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This update does not include any recommendations regarding office insertion of tubes in children without general anesthesia, despite this issue being deemed a high-priority topic by the GUG and triggering a position statement from AAO-HNSF. 25 The group consensus was that the quality and breadth of published research (November 2020) was insufficient to facilitate evidence-based recommendations on inoffice tube insertion but instead would warrant a distinct commentary article 28 published as a companion to the CPG update. 16 Twenty-five percent of children under the age of 2 years who had frequent ear infections had received tympanostomy tubes.…”
Section: Guideline Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The updated guideline does not include any recommendations regarding office insertion of tubes in children without general anesthesia, despite this issue being deemed a high‐priority topic by the GUG and triggering a position statement from AAO‐HNSF 27 . The group consensus was that the quality and breadth of published research (November 2020) was insufficient to facilitate evidence‐based recommendations on in‐office tube insertion but instead would warrant a distinct commentary article 30 published as a companion to the clinical practice guideline update.…”
Section: Guideline Purposementioning
confidence: 99%