2009
DOI: 10.1177/0009922809339844
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Office-Based Interventions for Recognizing Abnormal Pediatric Blood Pressures

Abstract: Interventions to improve pediatric blood pressure (BP) screening have not been well studied. The authors measured staff acceptance of 2 simple in-office interventions and measured the effect on physician recognition of elevated BP measurements. Group 1 used simplified normative pediatric BP tables affixed to the growth chart, group 2 used a personal digital assistant program (PDA) to calculate BP percentiles as part of the vital signs, and group 3 served as the control. Group detection rates by compliant (C) a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2022 Similar studies in pediatrics have been limited. 23, 24 An intervention performed in primary care pediatric practices using either simplified BP tables attached to the medical chart or using a PDA tool to calculate BP percentiles was not associated with significant improvement in recognition, and uptake of the intervention tool was fairly low. 23 Another smaller, EHR based intervention study found that automated reminders did improve in abnormal BP recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2022 Similar studies in pediatrics have been limited. 23, 24 An intervention performed in primary care pediatric practices using either simplified BP tables attached to the medical chart or using a PDA tool to calculate BP percentiles was not associated with significant improvement in recognition, and uptake of the intervention tool was fairly low. 23 Another smaller, EHR based intervention study found that automated reminders did improve in abnormal BP recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…23, 24 An intervention performed in primary care pediatric practices using either simplified BP tables attached to the medical chart or using a PDA tool to calculate BP percentiles was not associated with significant improvement in recognition, and uptake of the intervention tool was fairly low. 23 Another smaller, EHR based intervention study found that automated reminders did improve in abnormal BP recognition. 24 While use of the SMART BP app was associated with significant improvement in recognition of elevated blood pressures, uptake proved similarly challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…4 These results are similar to those obtained in a pediatric emergency department setting 5 and in a large pediatric primary care setting. 6,7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following screening by two independent Community Guide reviewers, a total of 57 articles 2480 representing 50 unique studies of CDSSs for CVD prevention were identified. Of these, 46 studies 2468,80 met inclusion criteria; however, seven studies 35,40,49,57,59,62,64 judged to be of limited quality of execution were excluded from analysis. The update search (January 2011 through October 2012) identified 14 articles representing 13 unique studies.…”
Section: Evidence Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%