2008
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-Target Effects of Psychoactive Drugs Revealed by Genome-Wide Assays in Yeast

Abstract: To better understand off-target effects of widely prescribed psychoactive drugs, we performed a comprehensive series of chemogenomic screens using the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system. Because the known human targets of these drugs do not exist in yeast, we could employ the yeast gene deletion collections and parallel fitness profiling to explore potential off-target effects in a genome-wide manner. Among 214 tested, documented psychoactive drugs, we identified 81 compounds that inhibit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Haploinsufficiency screens have been used to identify essential protein targets of smallmolecule drugs and are much more stringent than synthetic-lethal screens. Response to sertraline has already been assessed using these knockout libraries, though in those experiments pools of deletions mutants were assayed in bulk as opposed to individually in separate wells (Ericson et al 2008).…”
Section: Swa2mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Haploinsufficiency screens have been used to identify essential protein targets of smallmolecule drugs and are much more stringent than synthetic-lethal screens. Response to sertraline has already been assessed using these knockout libraries, though in those experiments pools of deletions mutants were assayed in bulk as opposed to individually in separate wells (Ericson et al 2008).…”
Section: Swa2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more recent study showed that deletion of genes involved in vesicle trafficking-a number of which have mammalian homologs-causes hypersensitivity to chlorpromazine. A similar gene set enriched in processes involved in the intracellular vesicle transport system was found to modulate sensitivity to a diverse collection of psychoactive drugs by a group using an unbiased chemical-genomic approach (Ericson et al 2008).In an effort to understand why sertraline exhibits cytotoxic effects in a model system lacking the putative protein target, we began by combining the unparalleled specificity of a drug-resistance selection with rapid and cost-effective microarray-enabled polymorphism detection. In other words, we used whole-genome tiling microarrays, as opposed to cloning by complementation, to locate rapidly resistance-conferring mutations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical-genetic profiling, whereby growth of the pooled deletion collection is scored for hypersensitivity to a compound, enables the identification of target and off-target pathways. This approach has been used to interrogate the mechanism of action of both novel and clinically approved drugs, including chemotherapeutics and neuroleptics (Lum et al, 2004;Parsons et al, 2004;Parsons et al, 2006;Ericson et al, 2008;Hillenmeyer et al, 2008). Compounds with similar chemicalgenetic profiles can be grouped to reveal similar modes of action and similar targets (Parsons et al, 2006;Hillenmeyer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Dmmbiologistsorg 640mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some disease etiologies, targeting multiple proteins may improve the therapeutic efficacy, such as for antipsychotic drugs or kinase inhibitors with anticancer activity (1). However, off-target activity can lead to adverse drug reactions (ADR) such as the case with fenfluramine and torcetrapib, 2 agents halted in development because of fatal hypertension that was the consequence of secondary target inhibition (1)(2)(3). Highlighting the promiscuity of small molecule inhibitors, a recent in silico screening of 213 Roche compounds revealed an average of 6.3 target proteins per compound (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%