2016
DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.09.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in left main stem stenosis: outcomes, concerns and controversies

Abstract: Left main stem (LMS) disease is known to be a poor prognostic factor in terms of morbidity or mortality. Traditionally, it has been treated with constitution of bypass to provide required haemodynamic stability. We searched the literature for evidence on off-pump (OFP) surgery for treating this high-risk group of patients focusing in our review on postoperative outcomes, concerns and controversies. The majority of the studies identified showed favourable or equal outcomes of OFP when compared to conventional a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…OPCAB, despite a lower number of grafts, was found to provide similar or superior outcomes in LMCAD compared to on-pump CABG, and smaller stroke rates, even employing manipulation of aorta with side-clamping [21] .…”
Section: The Conundrum Of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (Lmcad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OPCAB, despite a lower number of grafts, was found to provide similar or superior outcomes in LMCAD compared to on-pump CABG, and smaller stroke rates, even employing manipulation of aorta with side-clamping [21] .…”
Section: The Conundrum Of Left Main Coronary Artery Disease (Lmcad)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Протягом останніх років як в Україні, так і в світі відбувається значне збільшення кількості операцій коронарного шунтування (КШ) без використання штучного кровообігу [1]. На відміну від коронарного шунтування із застосуванням штучного кровообігу, оперативні втручання, виконані за методикою «працюючого серця», мають такі переваги: не відбувається активації протеолітичних ферментів та системної запальної відповіді, відсутній негативний вплив штучного кровообігу на імунну систему, не виникає споживання факторів згортання та тромбоцитів [2,3,4].…”
Section: український журнал серцево-судинної хірургії 2019 ішемічна хunclassified
“…With evolving experience, some centers began to use off-pump technique in their routine daily practice and emerging number of reports in the literature have proven this method as a safe alternative to CPB. In a review article searching for studies comparing the results of on-pump CABG and off-pump CABG in patients with LMCAD, the outcomes, concerns and controversies were evaluated [46]. The majority of the studies identified showed favorable or equal outcomes of OFP when compared to conventional approach.…”
Section: Type Of Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%