2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-008-9193-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-label drug use among hospitalised children: identifying areas with the highest need for research

Abstract: Cardiovascular drugs are a domain of pharmacotherapy, with a large need for research in paediatrics. The results of our study can guide the researcher to future trials on off-label prescriptions such as cardiovascular drugs, especially due to the fact that the identified off-label prescribed drugs in this group are also mentioned by the EMEA to be prioritized for paediatric research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
47
1
13

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
47
1
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The most common reasons for off-label use were that the medicine was prescribed at a different dose or frequency, in a different formulation, or in an age group for which it had not been licensed [4]. Off-label use of drugs in a pediatric ward in Germany was reported to be 31% [6], in Switzerland 25% [7], in the Netherlands 44% [8]. Such a big difference between reported studies could be explained by different categories being taken into consideration when assigning off-label status: some only considered one type of off-label use, while others considered up to six (age, dose, indication route, formulation, contraindication, and lack of pediatric license).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common reasons for off-label use were that the medicine was prescribed at a different dose or frequency, in a different formulation, or in an age group for which it had not been licensed [4]. Off-label use of drugs in a pediatric ward in Germany was reported to be 31% [6], in Switzerland 25% [7], in the Netherlands 44% [8]. Such a big difference between reported studies could be explained by different categories being taken into consideration when assigning off-label status: some only considered one type of off-label use, while others considered up to six (age, dose, indication route, formulation, contraindication, and lack of pediatric license).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Off-label drugs were categorized with a hierarchical system established by Hsien et al [12] Categories of off-label were defined as follows:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once drugs were classified into a higher level (e.g. off-label category for age), those drugs were not analyzed for possible classification into any subsequent category [12]. Further, drugs were categorized unlicensed if they were unregistered drugs, unlicensed formulations of registered drugs or the use of nonpharmacological substances as medicines [2].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors have obtained consistent results and have detected similar, and even higher rates. 11,12 In terms of design, it is worth noting that PCTs have remarkably changed over the past years at our site: they went from being mostly randomized, controlled studies to almost the same number as open-label, non-randomized and uncontrolled studies. It is known that randomized and controlled clinical trials are the best tools to assess the effectiveness and safety of a treatment, but open-label uncontrolled studies are less complex and require a smaller financial investment.…”
Section: Eighty-seven Pcts and 449 Active Ingredients W E R E A S S Ementioning
confidence: 99%