2018
DOI: 10.2172/1476714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-Gas Condensate and Cast Stone Analysis Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The initial waste received at the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory (RPL) was from tank 241-AP-105 (hereafter called AP-105). The AP-105 waste was filtered for the removal of solids (Geeting et al 2018a), it underwent ion exchange for the removal of cesium (Fiskum et al 2018), had GFCs added and was vitrified in a continuous laboratory-scale melter (CLSM) (Dixon et al 2018), and the condensate produced from vitrification was concentrated and converted to a non-glass waste form based on Cast Stone (Cantrell et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial waste received at the Radiochemical Processing Laboratory (RPL) was from tank 241-AP-105 (hereafter called AP-105). The AP-105 waste was filtered for the removal of solids (Geeting et al 2018a), it underwent ion exchange for the removal of cesium (Fiskum et al 2018), had GFCs added and was vitrified in a continuous laboratory-scale melter (CLSM) (Dixon et al 2018), and the condensate produced from vitrification was concentrated and converted to a non-glass waste form based on Cast Stone (Cantrell et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%