Off‐axis response due to mechanical coupling across all six degrees of freedom in the human disc

Abstract

The kinematics of the intervertebral disc are defined by six degrees of freedom (DOF): three translations (Tz: axial compression, Tx: lateral shear, and Ty: anterior‐posterior shear) and three rotations (Rz: torsion, Rx: flexion‐extension, and Ry: lateral bending). There is some evidence that the six DOFs are mechanically coupled, such that loading in one DOF affects the mechanics of the other five “off‐axis” DOFs, however, most studies have not controlled and/or measured all six DOFs simultaneously. Additionally, the relationships between disc geometry and disc mechanics are important for evaluation of data from different sized donor and patient discs. The objectives of this study were to quantify the mechanical behavior of the intervertebral disc in all six degrees of freedom (DOFs), measure the coupling between the applied motion in each DOF with the resulting off‐axis motions, and test the hypothesis that disc geometry influences these mechanical behaviors. All off‐axis displacements and rotations were significantly correlated with the applied DOF and were of similar magnitude as physiologically relevant motion, confirming that off‐axis coupling is an important mechanical response. Interestingly, there were pairs of DOFs that were especially strongly coupled: lateral shear (Tx) and lateral bending (Ry), anterior‐posterior shear (Ty) and flexion‐extension (Rx), and compression (Tz) and torsion (Rz). Large off‐axis shears may contribute to injury risk in bending and flexion. In addition, the disc responded to shear (Tx, Ty) and rotational loading (Rx, Ry, and Rz) by increasing in disc height in order to maintain the applied compressive load. Quantifying these mechanical behaviors across all six DOF are critical for designing and testing disc therapies, such as implants and tissue engineered constructs, and also for validating finite element models.

One strike loading organ culture model to investigate the post-traumatic disc degenerative condition

“…5 . A histological modified scoring standard was used based on literatures [ 26 , 35 ] ( Table 1 ). Different cleft patterns were found in the AF tissue of IVDs from control and one strike model groups.…”

“…Notably, the risk of disc degeneration is increased in manual laborers such as carpenters and drivers of machinery [ 24 ]. Excessive mechanical loading or acute trauma to IVDs is thought to contribute to the degeneration and pain [ 15 , [25] , [26] , [27] ]. Ghanem et al.…”

Lumbar and cervical viscoelastic disc replacement: Concepts and current experience

“…In addition, male and female central metal limiters contribute to shear and compression control. The combination of central and peripheral limiters claims better control of the coupling of the 6 functional 6 DOFs[ 26 ]. Whatever the size of the implants used, the cushion is exactly the same with the same mechanical characteristics which avoids heterogeneity in possible mobility.…”

“…These two particularities are intended to avoid the implant kyphosis described for the Bryan type viscoelastic prostheses and potential asymmetry of sagittal ROM in case of kyphotic spine. Like for the LP ESP implant, the combination of central limiter and the asymmetric shape of the cushion claims better control of the coupling of the 6 functional 6 DOFs[ 26 ]. Due to the small size of the cushion and its axial limiter, the introduction of this implant must be very rigorous to avoid the relative sliding of the plates and the lesion of the central stabilizer.…”

Spine biomechanical testing methodologies: The controversy of consensus vs scientific evidence

“…7,134,137,155,160,161,176,215,240 Some studies have applied greater than 10 Nm, 39,150,166,167 and other studies measured bending moments while conducting tests in position or hybrid position-load control. 8,26,32,95,125,126,148,165,172,185,216,241 Lumbar spine bending moment: survey results…”