2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Off-Axis Crushes Simulation of Thin-walled Tapered Tubes Inserted with Foam-filled Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…206 × 126 mm (Figure 1a). Shape and dimensions were chosen considering similar investigations [12,13], where it was revealed how the structural response (obviously) depends on the geometric characteristics of the structure in a relevant way without however being able to propose the 'best shape' (as this response also depends on other factors [14]).…”
Section: Samples and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…206 × 126 mm (Figure 1a). Shape and dimensions were chosen considering similar investigations [12,13], where it was revealed how the structural response (obviously) depends on the geometric characteristics of the structure in a relevant way without however being able to propose the 'best shape' (as this response also depends on other factors [14]).…”
Section: Samples and Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song and Du [3] investigated four types of round composite tubes, [±75] 3 glass/polyester, [0 ± 75] 2 glass/epoxy, [±15] 3 glass/polyester and [±15] 3 glass/ epoxy under off-axis loadings to examine how the ply pattern and off-axis angle affected the energy absorption performances. More recently, Othman and Jailani [4] applied a numerical analysis to study the impact dynamic effects of crush performance of the tapered cross-section tubes, containing straight, single taper, double taper, taper triple and fourth tapered lightweight polyurethane foam filled alloy steel thin-walled tube. In their work an off-axis angle load dynamic effects in front of crash were examined at an angle of 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 degrees.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%