2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of tractors and men: masculinity, technology and power in a French farming community

Abstract: T he aim of this paper is to explore how cultural constructions of masculinity in a French farming community in southern France are articulated around ideas of masculine power as symbolised by agricultural machinery -notably tractors. This paper is centred around three main points. First, it is shown how male farmers use agricultural technology to reproduce and reinforce patriarchal ideologies which marginalise and exclude women from farming. Second, it is argued that tractors have become a symbol of masculine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in some instances, technology policy designed to encourage women farmers and to reduce women's workloads on and off farms has been introduced. Other studies show glimpses of women driving tractors (Saugeres 2002b;Pini 2005aPini , 2005b in the masculine space. In some instances, in taking up either full-time or part-time farming these women are seen to be creating a new gender identity for themselves (Blekesaune et al 1993;Pini 2005a).…”
Section: Masculinities and The Appropriation Of Farming Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, in some instances, technology policy designed to encourage women farmers and to reduce women's workloads on and off farms has been introduced. Other studies show glimpses of women driving tractors (Saugeres 2002b;Pini 2005aPini , 2005b in the masculine space. In some instances, in taking up either full-time or part-time farming these women are seen to be creating a new gender identity for themselves (Blekesaune et al 1993;Pini 2005a).…”
Section: Masculinities and The Appropriation Of Farming Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The sphere of the farm is a highly significant space in the construction of rural masculinities. For example, Brandth (1995), Liepins (2000) and Saugeres (2002aSaugeres ( , 2002b, working in different farming contexts, explore representations of masculinity in popular imagery of farmers. Conventional farming masculinities involve constructions of the farmer as a hard worker battling against environmental and economic obstacles and exerting 'his' authority over the natural landscape (Liepins, 2000, Peter et al, 2000.…”
Section: Farming Masculinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional farming masculinities involve constructions of the farmer as a hard worker battling against environmental and economic obstacles and exerting 'his' authority over the natural landscape (Liepins, 2000, Peter et al, 2000. These conventional representations are replicated in many different agricultural contexts, from rural Ireland (NíLaoire, 2002) to southern France (Saugeres, 2002a(Saugeres, , 2002b. Despite this apparent coherence, rural masculine identities are unstable and shifting, reflecting changing gender relations and rural change.…”
Section: Farming Masculinitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rural spaces are seen as maledominated and male-defined; places in which definitions of masculinity and what it means to be a 'real' man are bound up with mastery of the land, physical toughness and the denigration of normative feminine traits such as emotion and sensitivity (Bye, 2009). Farming continues to dominate rural societies and communities, even as the economic importance of farming deteriorates in many countries, and to be a 'good' (male) farmer is to dominate and tame the elements, to endure physical toil and extreme conditions, and to demonstrate mastery of the land and landscape (Laoire , 2002;Little, 2002;Saugeres, 2002a;Brandth and Haugen, 2005). In contrast, women's positions in rural societies have often been restricted to supportive and nurturing roles within the family and wider community.…”
Section: Femininity and Gender Relations In Contested Terrainsmentioning
confidence: 99%