2005
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.006650
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of souls, selves, and cerebrums: a reply to Himma

Abstract: Ken Himma argues that a human being becomes a moral person at the commencement of brain activity. In response to Himma, the author offers (1) brief comments on Himma’s project, (2) an alternative account of the human person that maintains that a human being is a human person by nature as long as it exists, and (3) a counterexample to Himma’s position that shows it cannot account for the wrongness of the purposeful creation of anencephalic-like children. The author concludes with replies to two challenges to hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the view of Peter Kreeft,2 and of many other Catholic philosophers, including Francis Beckwith,3 John Haldane,4 5 Stephen D Schwartz,6 and also of some non-Catholic philosophers, most notably J P Moreland, and Scott B Rae 7…”
Section: Thinking Philosophically About Abortion: Some Initial Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is the view of Peter Kreeft,2 and of many other Catholic philosophers, including Francis Beckwith,3 John Haldane,4 5 Stephen D Schwartz,6 and also of some non-Catholic philosophers, most notably J P Moreland, and Scott B Rae 7…”
Section: Thinking Philosophically About Abortion: Some Initial Argumentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Mental functions are powers that the soul has exercised by means of the physical entity called the brain [29]. A question is raised: "How is it possible for an immaterial substance to interact with a physical body?"…”
Section: Soul Must Have Materials Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A question is raised: "How is it possible for an immaterial substance to interact with a physical body?" [29]. No experimental data can be sufficient to bring us to the recognition of a soul, but there must be a substance as the basis of personal identity, for without spaceoccupying substance, there would be no way to account for the soul's ability to interact with the body [30,31].…”
Section: Soul Must Have Materials Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El concepto de animación u organización es descartado porque vimos que no hay interrupción de la animación ni de la organización vital en el paso ovocito-cigoto-embrión. Persona no es un concepto científico sometible a prueba factual y tiene tal diversidad ideológica-cultural que es imposible poner de acuerdo a sus proponentes 8,[33][34][35][36] . Los griegos, etruscos y latinos lo usaron en el sentido de máscara en los dramas 37 , para los cristianos se desarrolló respecto de la Santísima Trinidad; para un materialista puede no existir; para hindúes y budistas los animales son personas y divinidades; en legislación la persona es sujeto de derecho.…”
Section: A R T í C U L O E S P E C I a Lunclassified