2017
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1700453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of Mice, Dirty Mice, and Men: Using Mice To Understand Human Immunology

Abstract: Mouse models have enabled breakthroughs in our understanding of the immune system, but it has become increasingly popular to emphasize their shortcomings when translating observations to humans. This review provides a brief summary of mouse natural history, husbandry, and the pros and cons of pursuing basic research in mice versus humans. Opportunities are discussed for extending the predictive translational value of mouse research, with an emphasis on exploitation of a ‘dirty’ mouse model that better mimics t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
173
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
173
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While model organisms are an irreplaceable tool in our understanding of the requirements for immunity, we must turn to the human model to fully understand the human system. The differing environs between humans and experimental mice, who are frequently housed in the absence of specific pathogens, are likely at least partially responsible for the functional distinctions between innate immune cell subsets between the species . There is also notable divergent evolution with a number of important of functional orthologues being represented by distinct gene families in humans and mice, such as Ly49 in mice and KIR in humans .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While model organisms are an irreplaceable tool in our understanding of the requirements for immunity, we must turn to the human model to fully understand the human system. The differing environs between humans and experimental mice, who are frequently housed in the absence of specific pathogens, are likely at least partially responsible for the functional distinctions between innate immune cell subsets between the species . There is also notable divergent evolution with a number of important of functional orthologues being represented by distinct gene families in humans and mice, such as Ly49 in mice and KIR in humans .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collect and appropriately document and store specimens needed for assays described in point 3, and as applicable, fecal, or other relevant samples to facilitate assessment of any association of the gut microbiota with differential responses. 181,182 In their natural environment mice, like humans, are exposed to microbes, including pathogens, and thus should be regarded as metaorganisms, with their own specific microbiota (including bacteria, fungi, and viruses). 195 or questions.…”
Section: Validated Methods For De-risking the Npct (See Alsomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominance of the mouse as a model system is driven by several factors, including their relatively low cost, ease of housing, and their rapid reproduction times and large litter sizes. 23 Importantly, the availability of inbred mouse strains, in which every mouse in the strain is essentially genetically identical, as well as genetically modified mice lacking specific host genes, 24,25 has allowed the scientific research community to study how specific host genes affect the response to pathogen challenge while also promoting understanding of the host immune system and its role in protecting from pathogen challenge or mediating vaccine-induced immunity. 26 Mouse models do have limitations, including physiologic differences that limit how well mice reproduce key aspects of hostepathogen interactions, such as efficient influenza virus transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%