2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0046876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of Mice and Men: Divergence of Gene Expression Patterns in Kidney

Abstract: Since the development of methods for homologous gene recombination, mouse models have played a central role in research in renal pathophysiology. However, many published and unpublished results show that mice with genetic changes mimicking human pathogenic mutations do not display the human phenotype. These functional differences may stem from differences in gene expression between mouse and human kidneys. However, large scale comparison of gene expression networks revealed conservation of gene expression amon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clear cell RCC is thought to arise from cells in the proximal convoluted tubule, while chromophobe RCC is thought to arise from intercalated cells in the distal convoluted tubule of the nephron (Prasad et al, 2007). This theory is supported by TCGA’s analysis of clear cell RCC and chromophobe RCC gene expression profiles in the context of an external expression data set of normal tissue microdissected from various regions of the nephron (Cheval et al, 2012; Davis et al, 2014). We re-examined this model using this combined set of 888 cases, and confirmed that clear cell RCC cases had expression profiles most similar to the glomerulus and proximal nephron, chromophobe RCC cases were most similar in expression to the distal nephron, while papillary RCC cases were in general most similar in expression to the proximal nephron (Figure 1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Clear cell RCC is thought to arise from cells in the proximal convoluted tubule, while chromophobe RCC is thought to arise from intercalated cells in the distal convoluted tubule of the nephron (Prasad et al, 2007). This theory is supported by TCGA’s analysis of clear cell RCC and chromophobe RCC gene expression profiles in the context of an external expression data set of normal tissue microdissected from various regions of the nephron (Cheval et al, 2012; Davis et al, 2014). We re-examined this model using this combined set of 888 cases, and confirmed that clear cell RCC cases had expression profiles most similar to the glomerulus and proximal nephron, chromophobe RCC cases were most similar in expression to the distal nephron, while papillary RCC cases were in general most similar in expression to the proximal nephron (Figure 1B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We examined our gene expression data in the context of an external gene expression dataset of normal tissue microdissected from various regions of the nephron (Cheval et al, 2012). Supervised analysis, globally comparing each TCGA ChRCC or ccRCC tumor expression profile (n=66 and n=417, respectively) to that of each sample in the nephron atlas, showed high mRNA expression correlations for ChRCC with distal regions of the nephron.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exon 1a expression corresponds to p16INK4a isoform. (C) A cartoon of nephron (left) and heatmaps showing inter-sample correlations (red, positive) between profiles of kidney tumors (columns; TCGA data, arranged by subtype) and profiles of kidney nephon sites (rows; data set from Cheval et al , 2012). Glom, Kidney Glomerulus; S1/S2, Kidney Proximal Tubule; MTAL, Kidney Medullary Thick Ascending Limb of Henle's Loop; CTAL, Kidney cortical Thick Ascending Limb of Henle's Loop; DCT, Kidney Distal Convoluted Tubule; CNT, Kidney Connecting Tubule; CCD, Kidney Cortical Collecting Duct; OMCD, Kidney Outer Medullary Collecting Duct.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44][45][46] Each gene was queried in the metaanalysis results, by extracting all variants within that gene (including the promoter and the 59 region around it). For each gene, we accounted for region-specific multiple testing using a gene-specific threshold (0.05 divided by the number of found LD blocks at R 2 =0.2).…”
Section: Candidate Gene Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%