2018
DOI: 10.1002/hep.30186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of Mice and Men and Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite significant progress in our understanding of the molecular pathways driving liver fibrosis in rodent models, a lack of corollary studies in diseased human liver tissue has hindered translation into effective therapies, with currently no FDA or EMAapproved anti-fibrotic treatments available. Our multi-lineage ligand-receptor analysis demonstrates the complexity of interactions within the fibrotic niche, highlighting why current approaches to treat human liver fibrosis have proven so intractable, and provides a conceptual framework for more rational studies of anti-fibrotic therapies in both preclinical animal models and translational systems such as human liver organoid cultures 5,70,71 . Further, this unbiased multi-lineage approach should inform the design of combination therapies which will very likely be necessary to achieve effective antifibrotic potency 5,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite significant progress in our understanding of the molecular pathways driving liver fibrosis in rodent models, a lack of corollary studies in diseased human liver tissue has hindered translation into effective therapies, with currently no FDA or EMAapproved anti-fibrotic treatments available. Our multi-lineage ligand-receptor analysis demonstrates the complexity of interactions within the fibrotic niche, highlighting why current approaches to treat human liver fibrosis have proven so intractable, and provides a conceptual framework for more rational studies of anti-fibrotic therapies in both preclinical animal models and translational systems such as human liver organoid cultures 5,70,71 . Further, this unbiased multi-lineage approach should inform the design of combination therapies which will very likely be necessary to achieve effective antifibrotic potency 5,6 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3,4) Despite considerable progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of NASH, the critical factors that drive the progression of simple steatosis to NASH remain largely unknown, and existing animal models fail to reflect the full spectrum of NAFLD progression. (5)(6)(7) For example, although chronic feeding of a high-fat diet (HFD) leads to obesity and insulin resistance in mice, two crucial risk factors for NASH, (8) it only mimics the gene expression profile and histopathology of simple steatosis but not those of NASH. (5,6) A key feature of human NASH is a robust infiltration of neutrophils in the liver, which is not significantly observed in fatty livers in individuals with obesity or in HFD-fed mice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To systemically evaluate the role of SHP-1 in NASH, we used the MCD diet-induced NASH model in vivo in our study. Unlike HFD, MCD diet led to severe liver injury in mice that was histologically similar to human NASH, whereas without weight gain or overt IR [16,28]. This allows for the evaluation the role of SHP-1 on NASH independently from its effects on IR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most surprisingly, despite more extensive hepatic steatosis, the inflammatory profiles of the HFD-fed Ptpn6 HKO livers were similar or even improved as compared to their littermates. It should be noted that they used the HFD-induced NAFLD model, which frequently lead to nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL) in mice, but without much inflammation or fibrosis [16]. Thus, to extensively elucidate the role of SHP-1 in the progression of NASH, we fed the mice with methionine-and cholinedeficient (MCD) diet, which had been proven to be a useful experimental model for NASH [17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%