2003
DOI: 10.1177/153244000300300204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of Footnotes, Missing Data, and Lessons for 50-State Data Collection: The Gubernatorial Campaign Finance Data Project, 1977-2001

Abstract: This article serves three purposes. First, we present a new source of campaign finance data for the 50 states. This includes annual data on candidate expenditures in gubernatorial races from 1977 to 2001, as well as triennial and biennial data on campaign finance laws affecting gubernatorial races during this period. Second, we review the various sources of campaign finance data for the 50 states. Third, we examine the challenges of collecting and compiling data across the 50 states, since these data can vary … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we asked a set of 10 research assistants unfamiliar with our hypotheses (and with the election results) to rate the apparent confidence of the candidates in our sample. 22 The difference in average confidence ratings received by the Democrat and Republican candidates in each race in our sample is not statistically significantly correlated with either the Democrat's share of the two-party vote or the share of participants predicting the Democrat to win. As a consequence, including this confidence measure as a control in a regression of vote shares on participants' ratings has no meaningful effect on the magnitude or statistical significance of the estimated effect of candidate appeal on electoral success.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To this end, we asked a set of 10 research assistants unfamiliar with our hypotheses (and with the election results) to rate the apparent confidence of the candidates in our sample. 22 The difference in average confidence ratings received by the Democrat and Republican candidates in each race in our sample is not statistically significantly correlated with either the Democrat's share of the two-party vote or the share of participants predicting the Democrat to win. As a consequence, including this confidence measure as a control in a regression of vote shares on participants' ratings has no meaningful effect on the magnitude or statistical significance of the estimated effect of candidate appeal on electoral success.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The predictive power of participants' ratings survives controls for 22 The research assistants' ratings are reasonably correlated with one another, with an effective reliability (R) of 0.77 (Rosenthal, 1987), suggesting that the ratings did identify a common element among the clips. 23 We thank a referee for pointing out that selection bias may cause us to underestimate the relationship between personal appeal and election outcome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ing and cost per vote (Jensen and Beyle 2003), total campaign contributions, and business and labor contributions in the election cycle between 1998 and 2001. All these correlations are in the expected (negative) direction.…”
Section: State Campaign Finance Regulation Stringency Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note: These are the Pearson's correlation coefficients between the composite stringency index and subindices developed in this article and previous stringency measures. *p < 0.10; **p < 0.05 Source: Gubernatorial spending and cost data are from Jensen and Beyle (2003). Contribution data were compiled by the author from the National Institute on Money in State Politics (http://www.followthemoney.org).…”
Section: State Campaign Finance Regulation Stringency Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campaign spending data were obtained from the data made available by Jensen and Beyle (2003) Downloaded by [Queensland University of Technology] at 02:31 02 November 2014 As mentioned, one explanation for the lack of success of female candidates is their inability to acquire sufficient financial resources.…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%