Of Echo Chambers and Contrarian Clubs: Exposure to Political Disagreement Among German and Italian Users of Twitter

Abstract

Scholars have debated whether social media platforms, by allowing users to select the information to which they are exposed, may lead people to isolate themselves from viewpoints with which they disagree, thereby serving as political "echo chambers." We investigate hypotheses concerning the circumstances under which Twitter users who communicate about elections would engage with (a) supportive, (b) oppositional, and (c) mixed political networks. Based on online surveys of representative samples of Italian and German individuals who posted at least one Twitter message about elections in 2013, we find substantial differences in the extent to which social media facilitates exposure to similar versus dissimilar political views. Our results suggest that exposure to supportive, oppositional, or mixed political networks on social media can be explained by broader patterns of political conversation (i.e., structure of offline networks) and specific habits in the political use of social media (i.e., the intensity of political discussion). These findings suggest that disagreement persists on social media even when ideological homophily is the modal outcome, and that scholars should pay more attention to specific situational and dispositional factors when evaluating the implications of social media for political communication.

How Social Media Facilitates Political Protest: Information, Motivation, and Social Networks

“…The worry, in other words, is that democratic ideals are thwarted because, “Many people restrict themselves to their own preferred points of view—liberals watching and reading mostly or only liberals; moderates, moderates; conservatives, conservatives; neo‐Nazis or terrorist sympathizers, Neo‐Nazis or terrorist sympathizers” (Sunstein, , p. 2). Fortunately, several recent studies suggest that the situation is not nearly as dire as has been prophesied (Bakshy, Messing, & Adamic, ; Barberá et al, ; Flaxman, Goel, & Rao, ; Garrett, Carnahan, & Lynch, ; Vaccari et al, ).…”

Quantifying and contextualizing the impact of bioRxiv preprints through automated social media audience segmentation

“…A cornerstone of sociological 135 research is the principle of network homophily, which states that individuals tend to connect and 136 engage within a social network of others who share similar characteristics [23]. Online social 137 media is no exception: patterns of network homophily have been demonstrated in numerous 138 studies of Twitter users [24-28], and there is evidence to suggest that the homophily of an 139 individual's online connections generally mirrors their face-to-face networks [29]. Recent In this study, we present a framework for classifying members of a paper's audience on Twitter 148 into granular, informative categories inferred through probabilistic topic modeling of metadata 149 collected from each user's network of followers.…”

Understanding Online Political Networks: The Case of the Far-Right and Far-Left in Greece

“…Social media facilitate contact with diverse and heterogeneous political opinions unintentionally, when individuals use them for nonpolitical reasons [24], since information circulates across networks on various, di↵erent occasions [3]. A recent strand of research brings in discussion the importance of the nexus between online and o✏ine political discussions, as well as elements stemming from political psychology theories, like the level of openness of an individual and the level of political interest [22]. Polarization and Political Extremism Ideology is the driving force in echo chambers formation.…”