1997
DOI: 10.1177/1066480797051007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Of Cyberspace, Managed Care, and Family Counseling: Entering the 21st Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each of the 79 cyber articles is identified through abbreviated coding of the content categories and is embedded within the references section. The abbreviated codes used to indicate the content category of an article are as follows: clinical practice (CP), cybersex and couples (CS), education and training (ET), online support and resources (OS), teenager and child usage (TC), administrative and the business of therapy (AB), and cyber addiction (CA). These codes are indicated in the references section adjacent to the citation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the 79 cyber articles is identified through abbreviated coding of the content categories and is embedded within the references section. The abbreviated codes used to indicate the content category of an article are as follows: clinical practice (CP), cybersex and couples (CS), education and training (ET), online support and resources (OS), teenager and child usage (TC), administrative and the business of therapy (AB), and cyber addiction (CA). These codes are indicated in the references section adjacent to the citation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Atkinson and Gold (2002) pointed out, the early agenda for eHealth was driven largely by the for-profit sector, and it is important that researchers and educators step in and learn to evaluate and use this delivery strategy ethically and effectively. Thus far, research on the use of the Internet for relationship health has focused on cybercounseling, or actual communications with a counselor (either live or via e-mails and chat-rooms) (Jencius & Sager, 2001; Pollack, 2006; Stevens-Smith, 1997). However, none of these studies has examined the efficacy of such interventions in a clinical trial.…”
Section: Relationship-relevant and Family-friendly Ehealthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of digital technologies is well established in the broad field of psychotherapy, although early research focussed on couple and family interventions was notably absent (Backhaus et al ., 2012). While digital practices have not featured in the latest summaries of evidence for family and systemic psychotherapy (see Carr, 2019a,b), there has been increasing recognition that digital and other communication technologies can play a significant role in the conduct of couple, family and systemic psychotherapies (Stevens‐Smith, 1997, Negretti and Wieling, 2001, Livings, 2014, Bacigalupe et al ., 2014, Singh, 2014, Twist et al ., 2015, Borcsa and Pomini, 2017, Akyil et al ., 2017, Manfrida, Albertini and Eisenberg, 2017, Borcsa et al ., 2020). There are many useful reviews, opinion pieces and practice guidelines considering how digital and online working might be different to in‐person work (for example Jenicus and Sager 2001, Kuulasmaa et al ., 2004, Haberstroh et al ., 2014, Hertlein et al ., 2015, Hall, 2013, Caldwell et al ., 2017, Rollnick and Hellman 2019, Pennington et al ., 2017, Wrape and McGinn, 2018, Borcsa et al ., 2020), but there is no up to date systematic review of the digital couple and family psychotherapy literature.…”
Section: Introduction and Rationale: The Rise Of Digital Systemic Pramentioning
confidence: 99%