Odor recognition without identification

Cleary, Anne M.; Konkel, Kristen E.; Nomi, Jason S.; McCabe, David P.

doi:10.3758/mc.38.4.452

Cited by 37 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 37 publications

(110 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In short, during TOT states, people are biased to judge unretrieved targets as studied. This TOT bias is distinguishable from recognition-without-identification, occurring in situations where the recognition-without-identification effect does not (e.g., Cleary et al, 2010), and even in situations where the recognition-without-identification effect is reversed (Cleary et al, 2014).…”

Section: Members Of Underrepresented Groups: Reviewers For Journal Mamentioning

confidence: 94%

“…The font color was set using the E-prime software's black and silver font color settings, respectively. Although there were only three conditions (studied in dark font, studied in light font, and nonstudied), we kept the ratio of studied to nonstudied items equal, as in prior research (e.g., Cleary & Specker, 2007;Cleary, 2006;Cleary et al, 2010;Cleary & Reyes, 2009). Therefore, to simplify our counterbalancing, four versions of the experiment were created to rotate the answer through the conditions of studied versus nonstudied and dark versus light font across participants.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, participants give higher ratings of likely answer study-status to general knowledge questions whose unretrieved answers were studied than to those whose unretrieved answers were not (Cleary, 2006). The inadvertent finding to emerge from the recognition-without-identification literature is that higher study-status likelihood ratings are given during TOT than non-TOT states, regardless of the actual studystatus of the unretrieved targets (e.g., Cleary & Specker, 2007;Cleary, 2006;Cleary, Konkel, Nomi, & McCabe, 2010;Cleary & Reyes, 2009). In short, during TOT states, people are biased to judge unretrieved targets as studied.…”

Section: Members Of Underrepresented Groups: Reviewers For Journal Mamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The psychology of intelligence analysis: Drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.

Mellers¹,

Stone²,

Atanasov³

et al. 2015

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

134

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article extends psychological methods and concepts into a domain that is as profoundly consequential as it is poorly understood: intelligence analysis. We report findings from a geopolitical forecasting tournament that assessed the accuracy of more than 150,000 forecasts of 743 participants on 199 events occurring over 2 years. Participants were above average in intelligence and political knowledge relative to the general population. Individual differences in performance emerged, and forecasting skills were surprisingly consistent over time. Key predictors were (a) dispositional variables of cognitive ability, political knowledge, and openmindedness; (b) situational variables of training in probabilistic reasoning and participation in collaborative teams that shared information and discussed rationales (Mellers, Ungar, et al., 2014); and (c) behavioral variables of deliberation time and frequency of belief updating. We developed a profile of the best forecasters; they were better at inductive reasoning, pattern detection, cognitive flexibility, and open-mindedness. They had greater understanding of geopolitics, training in probabilistic reasoning, and opportunities to succeed in cognitively enriched team environments. Last but not least, they viewed forecasting as a skill that required deliberate practice, sustained effort, and constant monitoring of current affairs. A t APA, we understand how challenging it can be for you to stay abreast of the latest and best academic research on psychology. Disciplines Finance and Financial Management | Social and Behavioral Sciences

show abstract

Section: Members Of Underrepresented Groups: Reviewers For Journal Mamentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Members Of Underrepresented Groups: Reviewers For Journal Mamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The psychology of intelligence analysis: Drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.

Mellers¹,

Stone²,

Atanasov³

et al. 2015

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

134

130

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Some feature of the test cue was connected to the episodic memory representation, giving rise to a sense of familiarity for that cue. The finding has been subsequently replicated across a wide variety of cue materials, including odors (Cleary, Konkel, Nomi, & McCabe, 2010), music (Kostic & Cleary, 2009), famous landmarks (Cleary & Reyes, 2009), simple line drawings (Cleary, Langley, & Seiler, 2004), and celebrity faces (Cleary & Specker, 2007). For example, participants are able to identify that a famous face shown at test had the associated name presented previously during input (above chance), even though they cannot retrieve the name (Cleary & Specker 2007).…”

mentioning

confidence: 72%

“…The automatic priming of such information may be a key component underlying confidence ratings and TOT assessments. In fact, Cleary has likened the RWI phenomenon to the TOT experience (Cleary, 2006;Cleary et al, 2010;Cleary & Reyes, 2009;Cleary & Specker, 2007), assuming that sensing that a word is stored in semantic memory may be similar to feeling that a word appeared in the prior list.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Partial word knowledge in the absence of recall

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Odour perception: A review of an intricate signalling pathway

Tromelin

2015

Flavour & Fragrance J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The perception of odours is the result of the complex processing of a signal, which initiates at peripheral receptors and ends in the brain. Along this pathway, olfactory signal processing proceeds through several steps; each step possesses its own complexity, and all steps are also intricately connected. This review aims to describe the main intricate steps of olfactory processing in mammals, some of which remain unclear, and the close associations and overlapping nature of these steps. The causes of both the complexity and the variability of olfactory signals are examined: the nature of olfactory receptors, involving the diversity of the genome; the spatial organization of the olfactory epithelium (OE) and the olfactory bulb (OB); connections in the OB and from the OB to the brain; integration and processing in the brain, which leads to the final perception of odours; and odour recognition and odour identification, which is associated with the difficulty to verbalize a reliable description of the perception in humans. Finally, the last part of this review encompasses recent progress made to decipher and understand olfactory coding and focuses on computational approaches

show abstract

Odor recognition without identification

Cited by 37 publications

References 37 publications

The psychology of intelligence analysis: Drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.

The psychology of intelligence analysis: Drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.

Partial word knowledge in the absence of recall

Odour perception: A review of an intricate signalling pathway

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About