1972
DOI: 10.1021/es60066a008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Odor control technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 73 But the highly controlled condition of this method is considered scientific by many and has been put in use for odor assessment in industries like food, beverages, and perfumes. 74 , 75 , 76 In a less standardized sensory trial, a panel of consumer assessors, none of whom is either trained or screened before assessing, can also be selected for odor evaluation. In this case, it is closer to the real-life setting and can reveal how ordinary consumers react to odors.…”
Section: Odor Control In Sportswearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 73 But the highly controlled condition of this method is considered scientific by many and has been put in use for odor assessment in industries like food, beverages, and perfumes. 74 , 75 , 76 In a less standardized sensory trial, a panel of consumer assessors, none of whom is either trained or screened before assessing, can also be selected for odor evaluation. In this case, it is closer to the real-life setting and can reveal how ordinary consumers react to odors.…”
Section: Odor Control In Sportswearmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass transfer is mainly control by the solubility of the substances and the gas-liquid interfacial surface [16]. Hydrogen sulphide, organic sulphur gases, ammonia, organic nitrogen compounds such as amines, organic acids, chlorine, and other chlorine-containing compounds can be removed by scrubbing [17][18][19]. In this process, odorous compounds are transferred from a gas phase into a liquid phase.…”
Section: Absorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…- 2 Removal techniques include water scrubbing (with and without permanganate, hypochlorite, or lime), burning, and sorption by activated charcoal. The shortcomings of these techniques are that they require fuel, maintenance, water, high capital costs, they pollute the wash water, and/or some concentrate only, rather than remove the offender.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%