The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2000
DOI: 10.1007/s004149900130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Odontological identification of human remains from mass graves in Croatia

Abstract: This paper reports the results and methods of dental identification of 1000 human remains exhumed from mass graves in Croatia up to July 1998. Personal identification of the victims was performed at the Department of Forensic Medicine and Criminology at the School of Medicine in Zagreb. A forensic odontologist participated in the identification process by carrying out the dental identification. A total of 824 victims were positively identified, while 176 victims remained unidentified. Dental identification bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
27
1
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The most simple are visual recognition and fingerprint analysis. In poorly preserved remains, or in the absence of useable dermatogliphics, the identification team tries to narrow the range of possible matches using basic data such as age-at-death, sex, and stature, and then to establish or reject positive identification based on forensic DNA testing [5,28], dental records [3,4,29,30], or comparisons of antemortem and postmortem X-rays [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most simple are visual recognition and fingerprint analysis. In poorly preserved remains, or in the absence of useable dermatogliphics, the identification team tries to narrow the range of possible matches using basic data such as age-at-death, sex, and stature, and then to establish or reject positive identification based on forensic DNA testing [5,28], dental records [3,4,29,30], or comparisons of antemortem and postmortem X-rays [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process of recovering and identifying human remains from individual and mass graves has proven to be the most effective method of resolving the fate of missing individuals in the former Yugoslavia [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. The primary objective of these efforts is two-fold: first, to identify and determine if possible the manner of death of the recovered individuals, and second, to bring closure to living family members, thus supporting the human rights of both the living and the deceased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the bodies were found, exhumed from the mass graves and identified. At the moment some 1100 persons are still considered missing-they are yet to be found and identified [17][18][19]. The lack of the medical and odontological documentation to be used as ante mortem data is the reason for continuous need of the detailed forensic-anthropological analysis of human remains with the aim to create the anthropological and dental profiles of the found human remains in order to enable the dental age estimation procedures [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other dental methods can also be used in these cases. 16 One problem that limits the use of dental pattern diversity for identifying human remains is the insufficient quantity or quality of ante-mortem dental data. 1,7,17 Other limitations of the present study include the lack of regional tables for the comparisons and the lack of data for other age groups that were not included in the epidemiologic surveys.…”
Section: South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Resmentioning
confidence: 99%