The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-017-1057-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Odontogenic Tumours of Jaw: A Prospective Study on Clinico-Pathological Profile and Their Management

Abstract: Odontogenic tumours are a group of heterogeneous diseases that range from hamartomatous or non-neoplastic tissue proliferations to benign neoplasms to malignant tumours with metastatic potential. They are rare, comprising about <2-3% of all oral and maxillofacial biopsy specimens. The aim of the present study was to determine the clinico-pathological presentation of this heterogeneous group of lesions and review of literature. The present study was conducted in the ENT department of a Government Medical Colleg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average proportion of OTs among oral and maxillofacial lesions evaluated by histopathology increased from 3% (±2.9%) in studies that used the 1992 WHO classification of tumors to 4.0% (±1.3%) in those with the later classification ( 9 ). The mainstream of articles which were published after 2005 have used the 2005 WHO classification ( 7 - 14 ) except for few articles which used the latest 2017 classification ( 2 , 15 , 16 ). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of OTs according to the WHO classification in 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average proportion of OTs among oral and maxillofacial lesions evaluated by histopathology increased from 3% (±2.9%) in studies that used the 1992 WHO classification of tumors to 4.0% (±1.3%) in those with the later classification ( 9 ). The mainstream of articles which were published after 2005 have used the 2005 WHO classification ( 7 - 14 ) except for few articles which used the latest 2017 classification ( 2 , 15 , 16 ). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of OTs according to the WHO classification in 2017.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,27 Aiming to reduce these consequences, FNAC may be indicated because it is a low-cost and noninvasive technique; however, its use as a protocol for intraosseous jaw lesions is not unanimous. 13,19,26,28 Therefore, the present SR adds knowledge regarding the diagnostic capability of this technique, which could help to guide clinicians in making a more evidence-based decision when facing intraosseous jaw lesions on the daily clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even for experienced practitioners, the diagnosis of intraosseous jaw lesions can be difficult based solely on radiographic and clinical characteristics. Thus, for a more reliable diagnosis and correct surgical planning, a pretreatment IB is often chosen . However, this entails two surgical moments with consequences for the patient, such as pain, anxiety, and other risks arising from surgical intervention .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the topic odontogenic tumors was chosen as it is relevant for dental students and challenging to learn at the same time because of its infrequency and complexity. 16,17 A pretest and posttest procedure with one control group was performed (►Fig. 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%