2016
DOI: 10.1111/aos.13313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocular traumas in working age adults in Finland – Helsinki Ocular Trauma Study

Abstract: A typical ocular trauma patient was a man aged 31-45 with a minor trauma caused by a foreign body at work and a final visual acuity of 20/20. Most common serious injuries were contusion, OGI or fracture at home or at work and were caused by a body part, sport equipment or work tool. Factors causing common and serious eye injuries provide the targets for protective measures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

6
41
4
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
6
41
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not unexpected, considering the larger proportion of male workers traditionally engaged in high risk activities. The mean age of injured workers was 42 years old, which is relatively high compared to other studies [1,2]. However, the frequency in younger workers (16–24 years old) is about double that of the oldest age class (55–64 years old) (Figure 1), suggesting a significant protective role of experience, and this observation is supported by previous results [5,15,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This is not unexpected, considering the larger proportion of male workers traditionally engaged in high risk activities. The mean age of injured workers was 42 years old, which is relatively high compared to other studies [1,2]. However, the frequency in younger workers (16–24 years old) is about double that of the oldest age class (55–64 years old) (Figure 1), suggesting a significant protective role of experience, and this observation is supported by previous results [5,15,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Work-related injuries resulted in 5.6% of all OED accesses: this is lower compared to most other studies, usually ranging from 30% to 70% [1,2,6,13,14,15]. The most likely reason for such a difference is the inclusion in our study of all OED accesses, not limited to trauma (even though most of the work-related accesses were related to traumatic events).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This could be explained by the health-seeking behavior of the population studied, where males are given preferential treatment. Previous studies have highlighted this aspect citing increased vulnerability of male gender in being exposed to outdoor work activities in agriculture and industry [10][11][19][20][21][22] However, this does not particularly hold true for our study, where home-related injuries predominated.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%