The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1996
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199602000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocular Response to Lens Care Systems in Adolescent Soft Contact Lens Wearers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates of the prevalence of idiopathic staining in non-contact lens wearers vary widely due to differences in subject selection, study methodology and observer training and criteria [39], yet there is some evidence to suggest that the staining we observed more than 24 h after discontinuation may not be simply "normal" staining unrelated to long-term lens wear. Although some estimates of the prevalence of idiopathic staining in non-CL wearers are as high as 79% [40], other studies have reported prevalences ranging from 0% to 19% [41][42][43], compared with the approximately 39% of subjects with corneal staining in the current study. Due to the large size of our database, we can speculate that this excess prevalence of corneal staining, over and above the prevalence of idiopathic staining seen in non-contact lens wearers, and which was not the result of transient insult to the corneal surface due to lens wear within 24 h, is due to a changing ocular surface observable by clinicians from long-term contact lens wear.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Estimates of the prevalence of idiopathic staining in non-contact lens wearers vary widely due to differences in subject selection, study methodology and observer training and criteria [39], yet there is some evidence to suggest that the staining we observed more than 24 h after discontinuation may not be simply "normal" staining unrelated to long-term lens wear. Although some estimates of the prevalence of idiopathic staining in non-CL wearers are as high as 79% [40], other studies have reported prevalences ranging from 0% to 19% [41][42][43], compared with the approximately 39% of subjects with corneal staining in the current study. Due to the large size of our database, we can speculate that this excess prevalence of corneal staining, over and above the prevalence of idiopathic staining seen in non-contact lens wearers, and which was not the result of transient insult to the corneal surface due to lens wear within 24 h, is due to a changing ocular surface observable by clinicians from long-term contact lens wear.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Thus in the study of Korb and Korb (1970), the prevalence would rise from 37% to 58% if those with staining regarded to be clinically nonsignificant, were included. They noted that, in other reports, the prevalence of staining was lower in adolescents (Soni et al, 1996) and higher in older subjects (Norn, 1970).…”
Section: Fluorescein Sodiummentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Ordinarily, a proportion of corneas in normal subjects show a low level of punctate staining immediately after fluorescein instillation (Norn, 1962(Norn, , 1964Korb and Korb, 1970;Korb and Herman, 1979;Josephson and Caffery, 1988;Caffery and Josephson, 1991;Lloyd, 1992;Wilson and Ren, 1995;Soni and Horner, 1996;Schwallie et al, 1957;Thomas et al, 1997;Dundas et al, 2001), which may be considered to be a physiological event. It is also recorded on the tarsal conjunctiva (21%) and on the caruncle (Norn, 1964).…”
Section: Fluorescein Sodiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the many conditions it has been recorded with are meibomian gland dysfunction and marginal blepharitis, 1 conjunctivitis, 2-4 contact lens wear, 5,6 cosmetics, 7 hypertension, diabetes, 8 acute angle-closure glaucoma, autoimmune disease, chemical injury, 9,10 episcleritis, uveitis, 9,11 sickle cell disease, 12 and pharmaceutical drug use. 13 Clinical grading scales that allow the assessment of severity have been developed for many ocular conditions, including the anterior chamber angle, 14 iris neovascularisation, 15 retinal nerve fibre layer atrophy, 16 focal narrowing of retinal arterioles in glaucoma, 17 diabetic retinopathy, 18 hypertensive arteriosclerosis, 19 tarsal abnormalities, 20 and lens opacities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%