“…Full-text assessment was performed on 98 articles, of which 68 were excluded for the following reasons: 32 were reviews, 20 were case reports, nine did not provide adequate information and seven were meta-analyses. Ultimately, 19 case series [ [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] , [37] , [38] , [39] , [40] , [41] , [42] , [43] , [44] , [45] , [46] ] and 11 cross-sectional studies [ 12 , [47] , [48] , [49] , [50] , [51] , [52] , [53] , [54] , [55] , [56] ] were included in the current meta-analysis. Additionally, 11 case reports of atypical ocular manifestations were included for descriptive analysis.…”