1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-1693(00)92487-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Octahedral complexes of uranium(IV). II. Magnetic and spectral effects of tetragonal distortion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37 Applying the Boltzmann distribution, a state energy gap of ~125 cm -1 can be expected. [37][38] As with the other complexes, χT of 6 is strongly temperature dependent at 300 K, which is consistent with the large crystal field splitting observed in its NIR spectrum. On the other hand, the structure of 7 is quite similar to that of 3 and could be a useful diamagnetic substitute if one can account for the susceptibility of the U IV center.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…37 Applying the Boltzmann distribution, a state energy gap of ~125 cm -1 can be expected. [37][38] As with the other complexes, χT of 6 is strongly temperature dependent at 300 K, which is consistent with the large crystal field splitting observed in its NIR spectrum. On the other hand, the structure of 7 is quite similar to that of 3 and could be a useful diamagnetic substitute if one can account for the susceptibility of the U IV center.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…To estimate the energy gap between the ground and excited states, it is assumed that an excited-state population of less than 5% leads to no change in magnetic susceptibility . When the Boltzmann distribution is applied, a state energy gap of ∼125 cm –1 can be expected. , …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…103 A similar rationale has been invoked to explain the magnetic behavior of UBr 4 (Et 3 AsO) 2 , which exhibits a large tetragonal distortion and possibly an e ground state. 101,104 Comparable low-temperature behavior with 2 and 3 has also been observed in another U(IV) complex, namely (( tBu ArO) 3 tacn)-U(OC tBu Ph 2 ); 100 however this complex possesses a ligandcentered radical, in addition to the paramagnetic U(IV) center. It should be noted, however, that this qualitative model is probably one of many that could describe the magnetic behavior of these alkyl complexes, and as such further experimental and theoretical studies will be required to fully understand the origins of their magnetic properties.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The TIP (χ TIP = 7.7 × 10 –4 emu K mol –1 at 300 K) dictates the susceptibility and ultimately leads to the lower than anticipated room temperature magnetic moment . Temperature-independent susceptibility over such a wide range has been observed previously for U 4+ in octahedral tetrahalide systems incorporating strongly donating amide, phosphine oxide, and arsine oxide ligands. , In the absence of thermally accessible excited states, the observed paramagnetic susceptibility arises from field-induced mixing of the ground state with a higher-spin excited state. For 2 , the persistence of linearity in χ M T versus T as high as 340 K (Figure S4, Supporting Information) reveals that, even at this temperature, excited states remain thermally inaccessible, and the observed susceptibility can be ascribed to field-induced mixing of the singlet ground state with a paramagnetic excited state.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%