1995
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270194011522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Octacarbonyl-1κ4C,2κ4C-μ3-[cyclohexylphosphanido(2-)]-μ-hydrido-1:2κ2H-tricyclohexylphosphine-3κP-golddimanganese(Mn—Mn)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
4
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of a bridging hydride in 7 was confirmed by a doublet at −16.76 ppm ( J P–H = 30 Hz) in the 1 H NMR, and the bridging phosphido group shows a downfield resonance at 190.5 ppm in the 31 P­{ 1 H} NMR spectrum (Figures S22 and S23), consistent overall with the known analogues and 3 . , Additionally, the structure was confirmed using single-crystal XRD (Figure , top). Both Mn­(I) centers are hexacoordinated with a Mn···Mn distance of 2.94 Å, which is comparable to the Mn···Mn distance reported for 3 (2.95 Å) and other dialkylphosphido-bridged analogues. , However, this short distance is not a M–M bond but a three-center–two-electron bond in the usual formalism for bridging hydride ligands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The presence of a bridging hydride in 7 was confirmed by a doublet at −16.76 ppm ( J P–H = 30 Hz) in the 1 H NMR, and the bridging phosphido group shows a downfield resonance at 190.5 ppm in the 31 P­{ 1 H} NMR spectrum (Figures S22 and S23), consistent overall with the known analogues and 3 . , Additionally, the structure was confirmed using single-crystal XRD (Figure , top). Both Mn­(I) centers are hexacoordinated with a Mn···Mn distance of 2.94 Å, which is comparable to the Mn···Mn distance reported for 3 (2.95 Å) and other dialkylphosphido-bridged analogues. , However, this short distance is not a M–M bond but a three-center–two-electron bond in the usual formalism for bridging hydride ligands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Both Mn(I) centers are hexacoordinated with a Mn•••Mn distance of 2.94 Å, which is comparable to the Mn•••Mn distance reported for 3 (2.95 Å) and other dialkylphosphido-bridged analogues. 19,27 However, this short distance is not a M−M bond but a three-center−two-electron bond in the usual formalism for bridging hydride ligands. Treatment of 7 with 1 equiv of (iPr) 2 PH at 80 °C leads to the near-quantitative formation of the new complex 6 (Scheme 5, top arrow) (Figures S17−S21).…”
Section: H} Nmr Experiments (Figures S31− S33)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The P−Au−P bond angle (173.7(3)°) is slightly less than the ideal angle of 180°. A similar deviation from the ideal 180° P−Au−P bond angle was observed in the isoelectronic homometallic complex Mn 2 (CO) 8 [μ-P(Cy)(AuPCy 3 )](μ-H), which was reported to have a P−Au−P angle of 171.12(5)° …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…19,21 Additionally, the structure was confirmed using single-crystal XRD (Figure 2). Both the Mn(I) centers are hexa-coordinated with a Mn•••Mn distance of 2.94 Å, which is comparable to the Mn•••Mn distance reported for 3 (2.95 Å) and other dialkyl-phosphido bridged analogues, 19,22 however, this short distance is not a M-M bond but a 3-centered 2-electron bond in the usual formalism for bridging hydride ligands. Reaction of 7 and one equivalent of (iPr)2PH at 80 °C leads to the near quantitative formation of the new complex 6 (Figures S11-S15).…”
Section: Scheme 2 Observed Reversibility Of Mn-p/h2 Activationsupporting
confidence: 64%