2014 11th IAPR International Workshop on Document Analysis Systems 2014
DOI: 10.1109/das.2014.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

OCR Performance Prediction Using a Bag of Allographs and Support Vector Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the proposed method with other state-of-the-art methods including [7,16]. For evaluation, we used images from the well known database of ancient documents presented in [63,64]. This database contains 25 pairs of recto-verso images of ancient manuscripts affected by bleed-through, along with ground truth images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We compared the proposed method with other state-of-the-art methods including [7,16]. For evaluation, we used images from the well known database of ancient documents presented in [63,64]. This database contains 25 pairs of recto-verso images of ancient manuscripts affected by bleed-through, along with ground truth images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Balinese character dataset, Balinese philologists manually annotated the segment of connected components that represented a correct character in Balinese script from the word-level binarized images that were manually annotated [11,17,20] using Aletheia (http://www.primaresearch. org/tools/Aletheia) [62,63] (Figure 14). The Sundanese character dataset was annotated manually [22] (Figure 15).…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, it is very important to be aware of the OCR recognition rate before deciding between one of these three solutions. The amount of recent publications on this subject ( [63][64][65][66]) reflects the scientific interest in predicting OCRs recognition rate.…”
Section: Predict Ocr Recognition Rate Using Synthetic Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the real OCR rate and the one computed on the synthetic versions (Table 2 Column 1 and Column 3) is, on average, only overestimated by 0.03. Most of the success of different existing OCR prediction methods ( [63][64][65][66]) are related to the quality and quantity of the needed ground truth. Our prediction method presented here provides comparable results with the ones form the state of the art.…”
Section: Predict Ocr Recognition Rate Using Synthetic Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%