2009
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3939(09)70105-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ocena wpływu długości okresu przechowywania próbki krwi na wynik testu EMA. Doniesienie wstępne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both tests need small volume of blood (5-15 mL of EDTA anticoagulated sample), and they could be performed from one sample collected for complete blood count analysis. The advantage of EMA test is the possibility to perform the test up to 7 days after blood collection (10), but FC-OF should be performed on the day of sample collection. The specificity of EMA tests, which vary in different papers between 90 and 100%, is higher than FC-OF; however, the costs of FC-OF which are significantly lower compared with the costs of an EMA test account for performing FC-OF primarily to EMA as a screening test for HS diagnosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both tests need small volume of blood (5-15 mL of EDTA anticoagulated sample), and they could be performed from one sample collected for complete blood count analysis. The advantage of EMA test is the possibility to perform the test up to 7 days after blood collection (10), but FC-OF should be performed on the day of sample collection. The specificity of EMA tests, which vary in different papers between 90 and 100%, is higher than FC-OF; however, the costs of FC-OF which are significantly lower compared with the costs of an EMA test account for performing FC-OF primarily to EMA as a screening test for HS diagnosis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%